Saturday, May 13, 2006

Bush job approval falls to 29 pct in new poll

Reuters
Bush job approval falls to 29 pct in new poll

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President George W. Bush's job approval rating has hit a new low, with 29 percent of the U.S. public saying he is doing an "excellent or pretty good job," down from 35 percent in April, according to a Harris Interactive poll in The Wall Street Journal Online.

The poll of 1,003 U.S. adults said 71 percent of Americans said Bush was doing an "only fair or poor job," up from 63 percent in April. It said the survey was conducted May 5-8 and had a 3 percent margin of error.



Read More...

Rice, Rumsfeld block access to secret detainees

Reuters
Rice, Rumsfeld block access to secret detainees: ICRC

GENEVA (Reuters) - The United States has again refused the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) access to terrorism suspects held in secret detention centers, the humanitarian agency said on Friday.

The overnight statement was issued after talks in Washington between ICRC President Jakob Kellenberger and senior officials, including Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley.

"Mr. Kellenberger deplored the fact that the U.S. authorities had not moved closer to granting the ICRC access to persons held in undisclosed locations," the Geneva-based agency said.

Kellenberger said: "No matter how legitimate the grounds for detention, there exists no right to conceal a person's whereabouts or to deny that he or she is being detained."

The former senior Swiss diplomat said that the ICRC would continue to seek access to such people as a matter of priority.

The main objective of his annual visit this week was for the ICRC to be granted access to "all persons held by the U.S. in the context of the fight against terrorism, an issue he first raised with the U.S. government over two years ago," the agency said.

Antonella Notari, chief ICRC spokeswoman, noted that Kellenberger had first raised the issue with former Secretary of State Colin Powell and Rice, then National Security Adviser, in January 2004.

"We have just received a negative response again," Notari said on Friday.

The agency recognized there were legitimate grounds for holding foreign terrorism suspects who posed a threat to the United States, she said.

"Having said that, it is absolutely vital for such people to be held in a clear legal framework and that they are granted all basic judicial safeguards," Notari added. "Obviously this includes those people held in secret places of detention."

A Washington Post report last year, which said that the CIA had run secret prisons in Europe and flown suspects to states where they would have been tortured, unleashed a spate of investigations. But none so far have produced solid proof.

The United Nations torture investigator, Manfred Nowak, told a European Union parliamentary committee probing the allegations there was evidence of secret detention centers outside the United States, but no definite proof they had existed in Europe.

John Bellinger, the State Department's legal adviser, reiterated last week Washington's position that it does not outsource torture or transfer people it suspects of being involved in terrorism to places where it can expect them to be tortured.



Read More...

Bush housing chief investigated over contract flap

Reuters
Bush housing chief investigated over contract flap
By Caren Bohan

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - An inspector general is investigating allegations that Housing and Urban Development Secretary Alphonso Jackson may have improperly considered politics in withholding a federal contract.

But a White House official said on Friday that President George W. Bush was standing by his Cabinet secretary and longtime friend and would withhold judgment on any investigation "at this point."

Jackson was quoted in the Dallas Business Journal as citing a contractor's dislike of Bush in describing an incident in which that person was denied a contract.

The report said that Jackson had told a real estate forum: "Why should I reward someone who doesn't like the president, so they can use funds to try to campaign against the president? Logic says they don't get the contract. That's the way I believe."

Jackson and a spokeswoman later disavowed the comments but Democrats called for an investigation.

"We have received a number of complaints from the public as well as from members of Congress," said Michael Zerega, spokesman for HUD's inspector general. "We are reviewing this matter and will look to the facts and any applicable law or requirements."

Pressed on whether Bush would withhold judgment pending an investigation by the Inspector General's office, White House spokesman Tony Snow said, "At this point the president is supporting Alphonso Jackson.

"Alphonso Jackson has admitted that what he said earlier was improper, that it was a mistake, and the president accepts that and still supports a man with whom he's had a long and close relationship," Snow said.

Two Democratic congressmen, Barney Frank of Massachusetts and Henry Waxman of California, wrote to Jackson saying the comments originally reported by Jackson would be "improper and most likely illegal."

Sen. Frank Lautenberg, a New Jersey Democrat, has called for Jackson's resignation.

HUD spokeswoman Dustee Tucker has said Jackson was speaking anecdotally and offering an example of "how politics works in D.C." She also said Jackson was not involved in contract decisions at HUD.

(Additional reporting by Kristin Roberts)



Read More...

Friday, May 12, 2006

Employees of the Month

huffingtonpost.com
Employees of the Month
Cotty Chubb

Here's a way to send some thanks to Joe Nacchio, the former CEO of Qwest Communications, who initially refused the NSA's request for records, and Robert Notebaert, the current CEO who inherited the mess and blew the NSA off. Must not be easy to start a job with the Federal Government threatening you.

Note that, according to USA Today, "an NSA representative suggested that Qwest's refusal to contribute to the database could compromise national security, one person recalled. In addition, the agency suggested that Qwest's foot-dragging might affect its ability to get future classified work with the government."

Foot-dragging. Nice.

Seems like Nacchio and Notebaert tried to work it out.

"Unable to get comfortable with what NSA was proposing, Qwest's lawyers asked NSA to take its proposal to the FISA court. According to the sources, the agency refused. The NSA's explanation did little to satisfy Qwest's lawyers. 'They told (Qwest) they didn't want to do that because FISA might not agree with them,' one person recalled. For similar reasons, this person said, NSA rejected Qwest's suggestion of getting a letter of authorization from the U.S. attorney general's office. A second person confirmed this version of events."

You're running a modern telecommunications company, fully aware that you have a well established legal responsibility to maintain the privacy of your customer's records, and you think, "Well, let's see. We ask the NSA for a legal opinion from the court created to rule on these sorts of things that it's okay to turn over these records, and they say no. So we ask how about the attorney general (John Ashcroft, by the way, not Ramsay Clark) and they say no. What are we going do? Compromise our customers' privacy, under threat of retribution, for a request of highly dubious legality?"

If you're C. Michael Armstrong (AT&T), you say sure. Ditto F. Duane Ackerman (BellSouth), Ed Whitacre (SBC), and Ivan Seidenberg (Verizon). No problem.

But not Joe Nacchio or Robert Notebaert.

Qwest's website gives you a way to nominate an employee for most exemplifying the Qwest Spirit of Service.

Why don't you let them know that you think Notebaert and Nacchio are worthy of commendation?

You can do that here.

We all owe them a vote of thanks. They have served their country and its Constitution well.

Read More...

The Case of Chief Justice Roberts's Missing Papers; Investigators Are Still Unable to Locate File On Affirmative Action

washingtonpost.com
The Case of Roberts's Missing Papers
Investigators Are Still Unable to Locate File On Affirmative Action
By Christopher Lee
Washington Post Staff Writer

The country has John G. Roberts Jr. as its newest chief justice. What it doesn't have is an answer to the mystery of the missing file of his work papers on affirmative action.

The file, compiled during Roberts's tenure as an associate counsel in the Reagan White House, vanished in July when lawyers from the Bush administration were reviewing the materials at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in Simi Valley, Calif., as part of a vetting process before Roberts's formal nomination to the Supreme Court.

A newly released report from the National Archives inspector general's office shows that federal investigators failed in their first attempt to nail down what happened to the file, which became a flashpoint in Roberts's otherwise smooth confirmation process.

"This investigation is unresolved and the file is still missing," says the 64-page IG report, released in response to a Freedom of Information Act request from a Washington area researcher and posted Tuesday on the Web site Memory Hole. ". . . The OIG was unable to determine whether the missing file was taken intentionally, unintentionally, or lost."

Investigators did conclude, however, that the Archives staff did not follow agency policies and procedures in providing tens of thousands of pages of requested material to the two lawyers, who were allowed to review the documents in a private office "because it would be discreet and keep them out of sight of the main research room."

The lawyers working for the White House "were allowed to bring personal belongings with them into the room while they worked," investigators wrote. The lawyers also were left alone in the office with the records for as long as 30 minutes while they participated in conference calls with the White House, the report said.

All of which is unusual, because researchers normally work in public reading rooms under the supervision of Archives staff. Federal rules prohibit researchers from bringing in anything that could be used to conceal a document, and researchers must use paper and pencils provided by the Archives.

The report's findings contradicted the assertions of Archives officials, who said last August that an attendant had been in the room at all times and that the lawyers had been separated from their bags. Susan Cooper, an Archives spokeswoman, said yesterday that agency officials provided the best information they had at the time. Cooper said Reagan library staffers had to provide access to more than 70,000 pages within a few weeks.

"There were people there who didn't have a day off for six weeks," she said. "So it was not only the magnitude but the speed with which this review had to be performed that I think contributed to some of these procedures not being followed."

Allen Weinstein, the archivist of the United States, disclosed that the file was missing in August and requested the IG review, Cooper said. After receiving the report, management reminded all presidential library directors that federal rules must be followed even under pressure and tight deadlines.

"I think we just need to make sure that the procedures that are in place are implemented," Cooper said. "Unfortunately, the investigation also did not turn up the whereabouts of the file."

The White House has declined to publicly reveal the identities of the lawyers who conducted the document review, and their names and those of Archives officials were redacted in the IG report.

White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said yesterday that "the administration cooperated with NARA and its inquiry, and the report indicates that there's no evidence that anybody reviewing the files engaged in wrongdoing."

Officials who have attempted to reconstruct the file have said they believe it included a memo from Roberts urging the White House to withhold any response to two church officials who had complained about the administration's policies on affirmative action in the workplace.

"The debate is still raging" about proposed changes that would eliminate affirmative action goals and timetables, Roberts wrote, so "I recommend closing them out with no response," according to a copy of the memo the administration provided in August.


Read More...

Path Clear for Katherine Harris in Senate Bid (yes, that Katherine Harris!); Republicans Unable to Recruit an Alternative Candidate

washingtonpost.com
Path Clear for Harris in Senate Bid
Republicans Unable to Recruit an Alternative Candidate
By Chris Cillizza
Special to The Washington Post

The White House and Florida Gov. Jeb Bush were again unable to recruit an alternative candidate to Rep. Katherine Harris in the state's U.S. Senate race yesterday as Florida's top legislative leader announced that he will not run. The decision virtually ensures that the controversial congresswoman will be the Republican nominee against Sen. Bill Nelson (D).

Asked whether Harris could win the seat, Florida GOP communications director Jeff Sadosky offered something less than a ringing endorsement. "We'll have to wait and see what happens between now and Friday," he said. Friday is Florida's last day for candidates to file for federal office.

Harris insisted that she has "turned it around" and that going forward she will turn the focus onto Nelson, who is seeking a second term, and away from herself. "This isn't about me," she said.

Nonetheless, the pessimism over Harris's chances in a state that had been seen as one of the Republicans' best opportunities to gain a U.S. Senate seat shows the difficulty posed by the national political environment, which favors Democrats.

Faced with polls showing the president's approval ratings south of 50 percent for much of the past year, the White House -- in tandem with the National Republican Senatorial Committee -- has struggled to recruit their preferred candidates in North Dakota, West Virginia and now Florida, all three of which were carried by President Bush in 2004.

Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee Chairman Charles E. Schumer (N.Y.) said GOP candidates are backing away from races because they "are loath to spend the next six months defending the status quo."

The no-go decision yesterday by Florida House Speaker Allan G. Bense ends a year-long recruitment drive to find a Harris alternative that included overtures to former congressman Joe Scarborough, now a television commentator, and U.S. Rep. Mark Foley -- among others. Bense was encouraged to run over the summer but then, as now, declined. NRSC spokeswoman Brian Nick said Sen. Elizabeth Dole (N.C.), committee chairman, had not spoken to Bense in months about the race.

Even so, in recent days there appeared to be optimism about a Bense candidacy as evidenced by comments by White House political director Sara M. Taylor, who praised the state legislator as a "class act" and a "very strong leader," the first time the White House had spoken publicly in favor of any candidate in the Senate race.

But yesterday, Bense announced that he was leaving politics. Without Bense, state and national GOP leaders face the difficult task of lining up behind Harris and arguing that she can defeat Nelson after spending much of the past several months trying to find someone -- anyone -- to challenge her in the September primary.

The scale of that challenge is summed up in comments made earlier this week by the state's GOP governor. "I just don't believe she can win," Jeb Bush told reporters Monday in a frank assessment of the party's now-likely nominee.

Harris said she spoke "extensively" to the governor on Tuesday about the race and is "confident that whomever is in the general election against Bill Nelson that they will have the support of Republicans across the state."

From the start, Harris's campaign has been greeted with skepticism by party leaders in Washington and Florida, in large part because of the divisive role she played as secretary of state during the 2000 presidential recount in Florida. Those worries were exacerbated by the circuslike atmosphere that quickly engulfed the campaign as top aides abandoned the effort.

Harris struggled to raise the millions she would need to be competitive with Nelson, while news stories emerged linking her to a defense contractor convicted of bribing then-Rep. Randy "Duke" Cunningham (R-Calif.). Polling showed Harris trailing Nelson by double digits.

Seeking to quash rumors that she would drop out, Harris made an unusual appearance on Fox News Channel's "Hannity & Colmes" program in March in which she said she would risk the estate and legacy of her recently deceased father by donating $10 million to the campaign.

"I'm going to put everything on the line. Everything. Not just my career and my future but my father's name," she said at the time.


Read More...

House Appropriations Chairman Is Facing Federal Investigation

washingtonpost.com
House Appropriations Chairman Is Facing Federal Investigation
By Charles R. Babcock
Washington Post Staff Writer

The Justice Department has begun investigating the activities of Rep. Jerry Lewis (R-Calif.), chairman of the House Appropriations Committee, focusing in part on his dealings with a lobbying firm that hired some of his former staff members, sources familiar with the inquiry said.

One source, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the investigation, said subpoenas have been issued by the U.S. Attorney's Office in Los Angeles.

Lewis said in a statement yesterday: "Neither I nor any of my staff have been contacted" by federal investigators. Thom Mrozek, a spokesman for the U.S. attorney, had no comment on the investigation, which was first reported in yesterday's editions of the Los Angeles Times.

Recent news accounts have outlined the close relationship between Lewis and former representative Bill Lowery, whose lobbying firm, Copeland Lowery Jacquez Denton & White, specializes in seeking earmarks -- money set aside in legislation for specific projects.

John Scofield, a spokesman for Lewis, said that the chairman and Lowery, a former House member from a neighboring Southern California district, are "very good friends."

Two former Lewis staff aides have joined Lowery's lobbying firm in recent years. Last year, when Lewis became Appropriations chairman, one of them, Jeffrey S. Shockey, returned to become a top committee aide.

When he did so, he filed a financial disclosure report that showed he earned $1.5 million in 2004 as a lobbyist and was paid $600,000 last year in a separation agreement with Lowery's firm. Scofield said Shockey received ethics committee approval of the separation agreement.

Lowery did not return calls to his office yesterday.

The Lewis inquiry is at least tangentially connected to an ongoing congressional bribery case centered in San Diego and Washington, one source said. In that case, former representative Randy "Duke" Cunningham (R-Calif.) admitted he had accepted $2.4 million in bribes. Brent Wilkes, a San Diego defense contractor, is under investigation for allegedly bribing Cunningham.

Cunningham, a longtime colleague of Lewis's and, like him, a member of the Appropriations Committee, pleaded guilty and resigned in November. He was sentenced to more than eight years in prison. Wilkes has been identified as a co-conspirator in that case but has not been charged. Another contractor, Mitchell J. Wade, of Washington, pleaded guilty early this year for his role in bribing Cunningham.

In his statement yesterday, Lewis denounced Cunningham's behavior. Lewis said he had never told anyone seeking funding that they must hire a particular lobbying firm, and that he and his staff "never consider who the Washington representative is when reviewing project requests. I welcome a thorough review of these projects by anyone."

Research editor Lucy Shackelford contributed to this report.


Read More...

House Injects Prayer Into Defense Bill; Evangelical Christian groups demand that chaplains pray in the name of Jesus, and disregard other faiths

washingtonpost.com
House Injects Prayer Into Defense Bill
By Alan Cooperman and Ann Scott Tyson
Washington Post Staff Writers

The House passed a $513 billion defense authorization bill yesterday that includes language intended to allow chaplains to pray in the name of Jesus at public military ceremonies, undercutting new Air Force and Navy guidelines on religion.

The bill, which passed by a vote of 396 to 31, also contains significant adjustments to the Pentagon's original request, mainly by shifting hundreds of millions of dollars toward military personnel -- in the form of troop increases, protective gear and health-care benefits -- and away from new weapons systems. The measure includes $50 billion for next year's cost of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

"We're not a rubber stamp," House Armed Services Committee ranking Democrat Ike Skelton (Mo.) told reporters.

Before the bill reached the House floor, Republicans on the House Armed Services Committee added the provision on military chaplains. It says each chaplain "shall have the prerogative to pray according to the dictates of the chaplain's own conscience, except as must be limited by military necessity, with any such limitation being imposed in the least restrictive manner feasible."

Air Force and Navy rules issued in recent months allow chaplains to pray as they wish in voluntary worship services. But the rules call for nonsectarian prayers, or a moment of silence, at public meetings or ceremonies, especially when attendance is mandatory for service members of all faiths.

Focus on the Family, the Christian Coalition and other evangelical Christian groups have lobbied vigorously against the Air Force and Navy rules, urging President Bush to issue an executive order guaranteeing the right of chaplains to pray in the name of Jesus under any circumstances. Because the White House has not acted, sympathetic members of Congress stepped in.

"We felt there needed to be a clarification" of the rules "because there is political correctness creeping into the chaplains corps," said Rep. Walter B. Jones (R-N.C.). "I don't understand anyone being opposed to a chaplain having the freedom to pray to God in the way his conscience calls him to pray."

Among the provision's opponents is the chief of Navy chaplains, Rear Adm. Louis V. Iasiello, a Roman Catholic priest.

"The language ignores and negates the primary duties of the chaplain to support the religious needs of the entire crew" and "will, in the end, marginalize chaplains and degrade their use and effectiveness," Iasiello wrote in a letter to a committee member.

The National Conference on Ministry to the Armed Forces, a private association of religious groups that provide more than 70 percent of U.S. chaplains, also objected to the language. "Chaplains represent their faith communities and we endorse them to represent that faith community with integrity and loyalty to that tradition, not to the dictates of their individual conscience," the association's executive committee wrote.

Abraham H. Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League, called the language "divisive." Rep. Steve Israel (D-N.Y.) offered an amendment to add that chaplains should show "sensitivity, respect and tolerance for all faiths," but it was defeated on a party-line vote in committee, and the Rules Committee did not allow floor debate on the chaplaincy provision.

On military manpower, the bill boosts the authorized strength of the active-duty Army by 30,000 soldiers and the Marine Corps by 5,000 Marines. In addition, it adds $318 million to fully fund the Army National Guard's 350,000 troop positions -- rejecting a Pentagon bid to fund only those positions that are filled, or some 17,000 fewer slots.

The proposed cut in National Guard funding "didn't make sense. It was actually a slap at the National Guard," Skelton said. "It would send a terrible message that you guys don't count."

Committee Chairman Duncan Hunter (R) of California said he believes the Army National Guard will succeed in recruiting enough soldiers to raise its ranks to 350,000. "We're more optimistic about recruiting than they are," he said of defense officials.

The bill also adds $471 million to pay for Tricare health-care benefits and other programs for the National Guard, while blocking the Pentagon's proposed fee increases for some Tricare recipients.

The measure includes several items intended to bolster protection for U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan, including $109.7 million for jamming devices in vehicles to disrupt radio-detonated IEDs, or improvised explosive devices, and $100 million for surveillance aircraft to patrol roads.

At the same time, lawmakers trimmed some major weapons programs, making cuts of $326 million from the Army's Future Combat Systems and $183.5 million from missile defense.

The bill also slows the development of a new presidential helicopter and requires manufacturer Lockheed Martin Corp. to restore an alternative engine to the aircraft.

And it delays the retirement of B-52 bombers and F-117 stealth attack aircraft to allow more time for alternatives to be fielded.




Read More...

Ever-Expanding Secret

The New York Times
Ever-Expanding Secret

Ever since its secret domestic wiretapping program was exposed, the Bush administration has depicted it as a narrow examination of calls made by and to suspected terrorists. But its refusal to provide any details about the extent of the spying has raised doubts. Now there is more reason than ever to be worried — and angry — about how wide the government's web has been reaching.

According to an article in USA Today, the National Security Agency has been secretly collecting telephone records on tens of millions of Americans with the cooperation of the three largest telecommunications companies in the nation. The scope of the domestic spying described in the article is breathtaking. The government is reported to be working with AT&T, Verizon and BellSouth to collect data on phone calls made by untold millions of customers.

President Bush has insisted in the past that the government is monitoring only calls that begin or end overseas. But according to USA Today, it has actually been collecting information on purely domestic calls. One source told the paper that the program had produced "the largest database ever assembled in the world."

The government has stressed that it is not listening in on phone calls, only analyzing the data to look for calling patterns. But if all the details of the program are confirmed, the invasion of privacy is substantial. By cross-referencing phone numbers with databases that link numbers to names and addresses, the government could compile dossiers of what people and organizations each American is in contact with.

The phone companies are doing a great disservice to their customers by cooperating. To its credit, one major company, Qwest, refused, according to the article, because it had doubts about the program's legality.

What we have here is a clandestine surveillance program of enormous size, which is being operated by members of the administration who are subject to no limits or scrutiny beyond what they deem to impose on one another. If the White House had gotten its way, the program would have run secretly until the war on terror ended — that is, forever.

Congress must stop pretending that it has no serious responsibilities for monitoring the situation. The Senate should call back Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and ask him — this time, under oath — about the scope of the program. This time, lawmakers should not roll over when Mr. Gonzales declines to provide answers. The confirmation hearings of Michael Hayden, President Bush's nominee for Central Intelligence Agency director, are also a natural forum for a serious, thorough and pointed review of exactly what has been going on.

Most of all, Congress should pass legislation that removes any doubt that this kind of warrantless spying on ordinary Americans is illegal. If the administration finds the current procedures for getting court approval of wiretaps too restrictive, this would be the time to make any needed adjustments.

President Bush began his defense of the N.S.A. program yesterday by invoking, as he often does, Sept. 11. The attacks that day firmed the nation's resolve to protect itself against its enemies, but they did not give the president the limitless power he now claims to intrude on the private communications of the American people.





Read More...

After Vivid Ads, a Bill Stalls

The New York Times
After Vivid Ads, a Bill Stalls
By KATE PHILLIPS

WASHINGTON, May 11 — A provocative advertisement featuring a bright red push-up bra symbolized the fierce opposition to a small business health insurance bill that collapsed in the Senate on Thursday.

The advertisement, by the American Cancer Society, seemed to pop off the pages of newspapers and Internet screens for the past week in a three-dimensional way. "Don't Let the U.S. Senate Leave Women Exposed," it warned of the Republican-sponsored bill to allow small businesses to band together across state lines to buy health insurance for employees.

The Cancer Society and 200 other groups contended the bill would strip away protections for consumers, including state laws that mandate insurance coverage for cancer screenings, and would endanger sick or older workers.

Republicans called those claims scare tactics. The bill's primary sponsor, Senator Michael B. Enzi, Republican of Wyoming, told a gathering of small business owners on Thursday that there would be ample coverage.

Trade groups, including the National Federation of Independent Businesses, had mounted an advertising campaign to lobby for the measure. The House has passed a similar bill eight times.

All week, Democrats were united. They said Senator Bill Frist, the Republican majority leader, who had been promoting a Senate "Health Week," barred them from debating health issues like stem cell research or an extension of the May 15 Medicare enrollment deadline.

"We haven't had a health care minute," Minority Leader Harry Reid, Democrat of Nevada, said at a news conference on Wednesday.

The bra advertisement surfaced in certain states, including Maine, which has two female Republican senators, Susan Collins and Olympia J. Snowe, who is chairwoman of the Small Business Committee.

To woo Democrats, Ms. Snowe wanted to offer an amendment that would have protected benefits, like mammograms and contraceptives, as long as a majority of states required insurers to cover them.

Describing the bill as "a very important beginning," Senator Snowe said: "What's the alternative? Nothing or catastrophic coverage? That's the choice. This includes the coverage we care about as women and for women."

To quell other objections, Mr. Enzi had revised his bill to reduce the variations in premium costs for healthy or sick or older people. Democrats rejected that. Democrats eventually thwarted the measure on Thursday night with a filibuster. Mr. Frist fell five votes short of the 60 votes necessary to move the bill forward.





Read More...

Career C.I.A. Figure Is at Eye of Scandal

The New York Times
Career C.I.A. Figure Is at Eye of Scandal
By MARK MAZZETTI

WASHINGTON, May 11 — In a scandal featuring a cast of characters with nicknames like Nine Fingers and Duke, a former C.I.A. undercover operative called Dusty has become a center of attention.

Kyle Foggo, who is the man known by friends and associates as Dusty — and who on Monday resigned his post as the third-ranking official at the Central Intelligence Agency — has become entangled in a widening investigation that has already brought down former Representative Randy Cunningham, a k a Duke. Investigators say they are examining what could be a larger pattern of bribery and government corruption.

Mr. Foggo is an agency veteran who spent two decades undercover in five foreign postings, including Tegucigalpa, Honduras; Vienna; and Frankfurt. In each case, he provided logistical support for intelligence gathering and covert operations. Porter J. Goss, who has resigned as C.I.A. director, plucked him from obscurity in November 2004 and elevated him to the position of executive director.

Mr. Foggo's past is the focus of multiple investigations, including a C.I.A. inspector general inquiry into whether he improperly awarded agency contracts to a longtime friend, Brent R. Wilkes, a military contractor whose companies have received nearly $100 million in government contracts over the years.

Mr. Foggo has not been formally charged with any misconduct, and his lawyer says his client has done nothing wrong. But apart from investigations by the F.B.I. and the C.I.A. inspector general, Mr. Foggo's appointment to the No. 3 post provided a window on what many at the agency saw as erratic management by Mr. Goss.

The arrival of Mr. Goss in September 2004 led to immediate clashes between senior career officers and the Congressional staff members that Mr. Goss brought with him, some of whom had previously served at the agency. Mr. Goss's chief of staff, Patrick Murray, and the other top aides came to be known derisively as the Gosslings.

The man Mr. Goss first selected to become the C.I.A.'s executive director, Michael V. Kostiw, had to turn down the job when it surfaced in the news media that he had resigned from the agency in the 1980's after being caught shoplifting bacon.

It was finger-pointing over who leaked word of Mr. Kostiw's shoplifting arrest that led to the resignation of several top officials in the agency's clandestine service. Among those who left were Stephen R. Kappes, the deputy director of operations, and his deputy, Michael Sulick. Mr. Kappes is expected to return as the agency's No. 2 if Gen. Michael V. Hayden is confirmed as the new director.

Days before Mr. Goss submitted his resignation, the C.I.A. director asked Mr. Foggo to step down as executive director, according to one intelligence official who was granted anonymity to speak freely about the circumstances of Mr. Foggo's departure. The official said that Mr. Goss had concluded that the inquires into Mr. Foggo's activities had become a distraction and had the potential to damage the agency's reputation.

Mr. Foggo, 51, has admitted attending poker parties throughout the 1990's that Mr. Wilkes held in a suite at the Watergate Hotel in Washington. The parties were primarily attended by C.I.A. officials and congressmen, and Mr. Cunningham, a California Republican, occasionally attended. Several news media accounts have reported that prostitutes frequented the parties.

But Charlie Wilson — the former Texas congressman who helped engineer the C.I.A. mission to arm Afghan rebels in the 1980's — said he attended two of Mr. Wilkes's poker parties, in 1994 and 1999, and that they usually ended by midnight and that he never saw prostitutes at the parties.

Mr. Wilson said that the gatherings were small affairs of seven or eight card players that always had ample supplies of Scotch, beer and Dominican cigars. "The only thing that took place there that was out of order was cigar smoking on a nonsmoking floor," Mr. Wilson said.

Mr. Foggo was one of many C.I.A. officials close to Mr. Wilkes. In May 2000, Mr. Wilkes paid Brant G. Bassett, a retired German-speaking C.I.A. official known as Nine Fingers, a $5,000 fee to travel to Germany for five days as a consultant on a business deal that Mr. Wilkes was negotiating with a German software engineer, according to a former agency official aware of the arrangement. The official was granted anonymity to speak about the business deal.

Documents revealing the $5,000 payment to Mr. Bassett from Mr. Wilkes first appeared on the Internet on Tuesday.

Mr. Foggo introduced Mr. Bassett to Mr. Wilkes in the early 1990's in Mexico City, the former official said.

Before ascending to the top tier of the agency, Mr. Foggo had spent his career in what was previously known as the directorate of administration, now called the directorate of support. It is responsible for running the business side of the agency, and its duties include buying supplies, renting offices and handling bookkeeping.

Before being picked by Mr. Goss to become executive director, Mr. Foggo ran a secret C.I.A. base in Frankfurt that supported operations in the Middle East and Africa. Since the 2001 terrorist attacks, as agency operations have expanded in the region, the volume of money and goods handled by the Frankfurt base has grown rapidly, intelligence officials say.

According to Mr. Foggo's lawyer, William G. Hundley, the C.I.A. is investigating whether during Mr. Foggo's time in Frankfurt he knowingly granted a contract to Archer Logistics, a Virginia company headed by a relative of Mr. Wilkes. Mr. Hundley said the contract was for delivery of bottled water to C.I.A. operatives in Iraq.

The lawyer said that while it was possible that his client had signed off on the contract, Mr. Foggo had no idea that Archer Logistics was associated with Mr. Wilkes.

Scott Shane and Paul von Zielbauer contributed reporting from Washington for this article.




Read More...

US spy agency 'monitoring calls'

BBC NEWS
US spy agency 'monitoring calls'

A United States intelligence agency has been collecting data on the phone calls of tens of millions of Americans, a report in USA Today has alleged.

The country's three biggest phone companies have been handing over call records to the National Security Agency (NSA) since 2001, the newspaper says.

President Bush refused to confirm or deny the existence of the programme.

He said he had authorised intelligence gathering in the wake of 9/11, adding that the activities were "lawful".

"Our intelligence activities strictly target al-Qaeda and their known affiliates," he said in a brief White House statement after the newspaper report appeared.

"The privacy of ordinary Americans is fiercely protected," he said, adding: "We are not mining or trolling through the personal lives of millions of innocent Americans."

The USA Today report does not claim the government listened in on phone calls.

But it cites an unnamed source as saying the NSA has used data on telephone calls to build "the largest database ever assembled in the world".

Senate response

US senators reacted quickly to the allegation, saying they would order the phone companies to testify about it.

Senator Patrick Leahy, the senior Democrat on the Senate judiciary committee, reacted with anger to the report, brandishing the newspaper in committee meeting.

"We need to know what our government is doing to spy upon Americans," he said.

But Republican senators suggested Mr Leahy was over-reacting.

They pointed out that the story did not allege wiretapping, only the creation of a database in order to analyse calling patterns.

Experts disagree about whether the government has the authority to demand the data it is allegedly compiling.

"I'm quite confident that if it's true it's illegal," Prof Michael Greenberger of the University of Maryland school of law told the BBC.


WHAT IS THE NSA?
US government intelligence service founded as a code-breaking agency in 1952
Intercepts communications using satellites and bugs
Said to be largest employer of mathematicians in the US
Budget and staff size classified
Agency as a whole is so secretive its initials are said to stand for "No Such Agency"

The communications act of 1934 bars companies from releasing information about callers, he said.

But the three phone companies in question - AT&T, Verizon, and BellSouth - all told USA Today they had not broken any laws.

Together the firms serve more than 200 million customers. A fourth company, Qwest, reportedly declined to participate in the programme.

A civil liberties group, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, filed suit against AT&T last month after a former AT&T employee indicated the company was engaging in the kind of data-mining the USA Today report described.

Sensitive time

The Bush administration has asserted that the president has the authority to monitor communications in order to disrupt terrorist activity.

Attorney General Alberto Gonzales has testified before the Senate in defence of a programme of wiretapping without warrant ordered by the president.

The USA Today report comes at a potentially sensitive moment for the administration.

Gen Michael Hayden, the man who headed the NSA when the data-mining operation was allegedly launched, was nominated this week to head the CIA.

He is due to face confirmation hearings from the Senate soon.

Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein warned the latest allegations would "present a growing impediment to the confirmation".

White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said the president was standing by his choice: "We're full steam ahead on the confirmation."

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/americas/4762623.stm



Read More...

UK debates assisted dying bill

BBC NEWS
Lords debate assisted dying bill

A bill which would allow terminally ill people to be helped to die by physicians is to be debated by peers.

Lord Joffe's bill would apply to those in England and Wales set to die within six months and suffering unbearably, but still able to make decisions.

The bill proposes that after signing a legal declaration that they wanted to die, patients could be prescribed a lethal dose of medication to take.

The bill is not set to become law, but 81 peers are due to speak on the issue.

The debate highlights divisions between supporters of the right to die and those who want better palliative care.

Lord Joffe's bill, which is having its second reading in the Lords, proposes that doctors would be able to opt out if a request was made to them.


Care Not Killing

The bill is modelled on legislation in place in Oregon, in the US.

The debate over physician-assisted suicide provokes strong feelings and the House of Lords is starting at 1000 BST - an hour earlier than normal for a Friday - to allow everyone to take part.

Even if the bill survives an amendment tabled by Lord Carlile of Berriew to halt its progress, the government would have to allow debating time in order for it to become law.

'Vulnerable at risk'

Archbishop of Canterbury Dr Rowan Williams is among those due to speak against the bill.

He has written a joint letter to Friday's Times newspaper with Archbishop of Westminster Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O'Connor and Chief Rabbi Sir Jonathan Sacks.

In it, they say they believe all human life is "sacred and God-given with a value that is inherent, not conditional".

"We urge legislators to withhold support for this bill so as to ensure that British law continues to safeguard the principle that the intention to kill, or assist in the killing, of an innocent human being is wrong."

Dignity in Dying

Disability campaigners argue that assisted dying would create pressure for vulnerable people to end their lives and that the real need is to ensure that they get the best possible care.

The group Care Not Killing said it will deliver a petition signed by 100,000 people demanding an end to attempts to change the law.

Campaign director Dr Peter Saunders said: "We believe this is a very bad bill and one that would create serious problems for old and sick patients and the medical and nursing professions."

Earlier this week, a Royal College of Physicians poll found three quarters of members surveyed were against a change in the law, favouring better palliative care for the dying instead.

'Clear support'

But supporters of the bill say doctors should be able to prescribe drugs so a terminally ill person suffering terrible pain could choose to end their own life.

A YouGov survey of 1,770 people for Dignity in Dying (formerly the Voluntary Euthanasia Society) found 76% were in favour of assisted dying as long as there were safeguards in place.

Deborah Annetts, Chief Executive of Dignity in Dying, said: "The public is being massively turned off by this week's well-funded demonstration of religious opposition against a bill they clearly support.

"Even with the high quality of our palliative care, some people will still want this option."

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/health/4763067.stm




Read More...

Kentucky governor indicted over political hiring

Reuters
Kentucky governor indicted over political hiring

LOUISVILLE, Kentucky (Reuters) - A grand jury indicted Republican Gov. Ernie Fletcher on Thursday with illegally hiring workers on the basis of their political allegiance.

Fletcher has denounced the probe of his administration as politically motivated.

In the indictment handed up by the Franklin County grand jury, Fletcher was charged with three misdemeanors punishable by up to a year in jail -- conspiracy, official misconduct and violating a prohibition against political discrimination.

Fletcher was elected governor in 2003, the first Republican since 1967 to capture the post, and 13 members of his administration have been charged with replacing some state employees with Republican loyalists. State law forbids the awarding of jobs on the basis of political clout except for some high-ranking jobs.

In August, Fletcher declared a blanket pardon for anyone except himself to be charged in the yearlong probe led by Kentucky Attorney General Greg Stumbo, a Democrat.

Read More...

Republicans create new issue bring conservatives to the polls in November

CNET News.com http://www.news.com/
Congress targets social network sites

By Declan McCullagh
http://news.com.com/Congress+targets+social+network+sites/2100-1028_3-6071040.html

MySpace.com is facing a new threat on Capitol Hill.

MySpace and other social-networking sites like LiveJournal.com and Facebook are the potential targets for a proposed federal law that would effectively require most schools and libraries to render those Web sites inaccessible to minors, an age group that includes some of the category's most ardent users.

"When children leave the home and go to school or the public library and have access to social-networking sites, we have reason to be concerned," Rep. Michael Fitzpatrick, a Pennsylvania Republican, told CNET News.com in an interview.

Fitzpatrick and fellow Republicans, including House Speaker Dennis Hastert, on Wednesday endorsed new legislation (click here for PDF) that would cordon off access to commercial Web sites that let users create public "Web pages or profiles" and also offer a discussion board, chat room, or e-mail service.

That's a broad category that covers far more than social-networking sites such as Friendster and Google's Orkut.com. It would also sweep in a wide range of interactive Web sites and services, including Blogger.com, AOL and Yahoo's instant-messaging features, and Microsoft's Xbox 360, which permits in-game chat.

Fitzpatrick's bill, called the Deleting Online Predators Act, or DOPA, is part of a new, poll-driven effort by Republicans to address topics that they view as important to suburban voters. Republican pollster John McLaughlin polled 22 suburban districts and presented his research at a retreat earlier this year. Rep. Mark Kirk, an Illinois Republican, is co-sponsoring the measure.

The group, which is calling itself the "Suburban Caucus," convened a press conference on Wednesday to announce new legislation it hopes will rally conservative supporters--and prevent the Democrats from retaking the House of Representatives during the November mid-term election.

For its part, MySpace has taken steps in recent weeks to assuage concerns among parents and politicians (Massachusetts Attorney General Tom Reilly also took aim at MySpace this week). It has assigned about 100 employees, about one-third of its workforce, to deal with security and customer care, and hired Hemanshu (Hemu) Nigam, a former Justice Department prosecutor as chief security officer last month.

"We have been working collaboratively on security and safety issues with an array of government agencies, law enforcement and educational groups, nonprofits and leading child safety organizations," said Rick Lane, vice president for government affairs at MySpace owner News Corp. "We've also met with several state and federal legislators and are working with them to address their concerns. We hope this healthy dialogue will continue."

Fitzpatrick, who represents a suburban district outside Philadelphia, acknowledged that MySpace "is working" on this. Still, he said, children are "unattended on the Internet through the course of the day" when they're at libraries and schools.

"My bill is both timely and needed and will be very well-accepted, certainly by the constituents I represent," Fitzpatrick said.

Backers of the proposal argue that it's necessary to protect children. Hastert said on Wednesday that it "would put filters in schools and libraries so that kids can be protected... We've all heard stories of children on some of these social Web sites meeting up with dangerous predators. This legislation adds another layer of protection."
To curb teenage access to interactive Web sites, Republicans chose to target libraries and schools by expanding a federal law called the Children's Internet Protection Act.

That law, signed by President Clinton in December 2000, requires schools and libraries that receive federal funding to block access to off-color materials. Librarians challenged it in federal court on First Amendment grounds, and the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the law by a 6-3 vote in June 2003.

DOPA would add an additional requirement. It says that libraries, elementary and secondary schools must prohibit "access to a commercial social-networking Web site or chat room through which minors" may access sexual material or be "subject to" sexual advances. Those may be made available to an adult or a minor with adult supervision "for educational purposes."

Lynne Bradley, director of the American Library Association's office of government relations, said she was still reviewing the legislation. She added that: "We're as protective of kids as any other protection in this whole field, but we do know there are legitimate uses (of social-networking sites)."

"ALA is always in favor of having quality and detailed education on how best to use the Internet and these other digital tools and the best user is an informed user that knows the risks, how to avoid them, and knows how to keep him or herself safe," Bradley said.

According to the Federal Communications Commission, there have been 25,707 agreements to provide federal funding to school districts or individual schools, and 3,902 agreements to libraries or library systems. The ALA estimates that as many as two-thirds of libraries receive federal funding and would be affected by DOPA.

DOPA would also require the Federal Trade Commission to set up a Web site about the "potential dangers posed by the use of the Internet by children" and order the Federal Communications Commission to create a committee and publish a list of Web sites "that have been known to allow sexual predators" access to minors' personal information.

Rosa Aronson, director of advocacy for the National Association of Secondary School Principals also said her organization did not currently have a position on DOPA.

"We are grappling with the tension between promoting our normal policy, which is to promote local control for schools, and on the other end of the spectrum, there is the issue of protection of students," Aronson said.

Adam Thierer, a senior fellow at the free-market Progress & Freedom Foundation, was not as reticent. "This is the next major battlefield in the ongoing Internet censorship wars: social- networking Web sites," he said.

"Many in government will want to play the role of cyber traffic cop here, just as they have for other types of speech on the Internet," Thierer said, adding that it will "chill legitimate forms of speech or expression online."
In other news:

* Unlikely bidders eye wireless spectrum
* This is your brain on a microchip
* Solar panels keep low profile
* News.com Extra: Analyst predicts Wii will cost $200
* Video: Microsoft bites back at E3

Laws restricting Web sites tend to be challenged in the courts. The ALA, for instance, sued to overturn the Communications Decency Act in 1996 and the library-filtering requirement a few years later.

But DOPA seems to have been written to benefit from the high court's 2003 ruling that library filtering was permissible. Bob Corn-Revere, a partner at the law firm of Davis Wright Tremaine who has argued before the Supreme Court, said the eventual fate of DOPA may depend on whether it's implemented narrowly or broadly.

Even so, Corn-Revere said, "treating MySpace sites like poison seems like an extreme overreaction."

CNET News.com's Anne Broache contributed to this report.






Read More...

Thursday, May 11, 2006

Dobbs to president: Do you take us for fools?

CNN.com
Dobbs to president: Do you take us for fools?
By Lou Dobbs

NEW YORK -- Reports this week that the Border Patrol is notifying the Mexican government of the locations of Minutemen volunteers are being denied by U.S. Customs and Border Protection. True or not, the Bush administration continues to follow absurd policies on both issues of border security and illegal immigration.

President Bush continues to push his guest worker program and amnesty for anywhere between 11 million and 20 million illegal aliens, and he insists still that nothing less than what he calls comprehensive immigration reform is acceptable.

And the lies keep coming from both political parties. This president is not enforcing the immigration laws enacted by Congress, and this Congress is failing in its duty of oversight to demand that those laws be followed.

Only a fool, Mr. President, Sen. Kennedy, Sen. McCain, would believe you when you speak of new legislation. You don't enforce the laws now.

Would you do so if the law were more to your liking? Would you secure our borders and ports? Would you halt illegal immigration? Those are rhetorical questions, only, I assure you. The answers are obvious; obvious because of your conduct.

As many as 3 million illegal aliens continue to cross our border with Mexico each year. Enforcement against illegal employers of illegal aliens in this country is all but nonexistent, Mr. President. How do you explain that the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents have all but ended their investigations and inspections of employers that hire illegal aliens? Again, only a rhetorical question, because we all know the answer.

But here is the official record of your sense of duty: 318 employers out of five and a half million in this country have been fined for hiring illegal aliens since 2001. In 2004, only three employers were fined. That is a dismal record, Mr. President, as dismal as the fact that the number of ICE agents assigned to enforce immigration laws in the workplace has declined from only 240 back in 1999 to now less than 100.

Illegal employer
alien fines
2001 100
2002 53
2003 162
2004 3
(Source: GAO reports,8/31/05)

The problem in our lack of border security and illegal immigration is becoming increasingly obvious: two political parties that are beholden to corporate America, the largest employers of illegal aliens, and the leadership of both parties that are selling out American citizens in search of cheap labor and political advantage. How dumb do you all think we are? Again, that's only a rhetorical question.

Over the next few days on my broadcast, I'm going to make a suggestion that I hope may help the leadership of both the Republican and Democratic parties begin to take some notice of our laws and our expectations that those laws be enforced. And also take at least some notice of the fact that Republicans and Democrats also represent American citizens, not just corporate America and special interests.



Find this article at:
http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/05/10/dobbs.enforcement/index.html?section=cnn_topstories





Read More...

Minute-by-minute schedule for the President's trip to Florida found in trash hours before the trip took place

wusatv9.com
White House Responds To 9 News Exclusive

Bush Administration officials insist they have no idea how a minute-by-minute schedule for the President's trip to Florida landed in a pile of trash, where almost anyone could grab it, hours before the President took off.

But the White House does admit the document should have been burned not tossed.

The document in question appears to be a White House staff schedule for the President's trip to Florida Tuesday. And a sanitation worker was alarmed to find in the trash long hours before Mr. Bush left for his trip.

It's the kind of thing you would expect would be shredded or burned, not thrown in the garbage.

Randy Hopkins could not believe what he was seeing.

There on the floor next to a big trash truck was a thick sheaf of papers with nearly every detail of the President's voyage.

“I saw locations and names and places where the President was going to be. I knew it was important. And it shouldn't have been in a trash hole like this,” he said.

Hopkins works in sanitation. He's an ex-con, and he's worried about fallout from talking to us, so he's asked us not to say exactly where he's employed. But he also felt it was his civic duty to tell somebody about what he'd found.

“We're going through a war, and if it would have fell into the wrong hands at the right time, it would have been something really messy for the President's sake,” he said.

The documents details the exact arrival and departure time for Air Force One, Marine One and the back up choppers, Nighthawk 2 and Three.

It lists every passenger on board each aircraft, from the President to military attaché with nuclear football. It offers the order of vehicles in the President's motorcade.

We faxed a copy to the Secret Service, which as usual rule declined to say much, other than insisting that it was a White House staff document, not a Secret Service document.

A spokesman traveling with President Bush says officials are still trying to learn more about the papers. The White House confirms the 9 News story and says many White House offices have "burn bags" that are used to discard sensitive documents like the schedule. However, it appears this one ended up in the general trash.

What do you think the message is that comes out of this? Shred the important papers.

Read More...

Thousands of homes in foreclosure could put Colorado's housing market under severe stress

rismedia.com

Thousands of homes in foreclosure could put Colorado's housing market under severe stress this summer, according to real-estate experts.

Colorado reported 5,392 foreclosures in March, making for the highest rate per household of any state, according to RealtyTrac, a provider of foreclosure listings.

Of the Colorado foreclosures:

--Thirty-one percent, or 1,648, were in the preforeclosure or notification stage, where delinquent borrowers have the best chance to keep their property.

--Fifty-four percent, or 2,894, were headed to auction, where outside investors can claim the property by paying off the mortgage.

--Sixteen percent, or 850 homes, were in the hands of lenders, who are often forced to sell the properties for whatever they can get.

Should a larger share of homes in the auction phase end up with banks and mortgage companies, that would indicate a troubling weakness in Colorado's home market.

Such a surge could put additional pressure on markets where the number of unsold homes has swollen.

"If that number starts to spike, that is a red flag," said Rick Sharga, a vice president with RealtyTrac, a California company that tracks foreclosures through public records.

Most of the homes that are in the auction process don't end up with lenders, because either homeowners find a buyer or investors step in and pay off the mortgage, Sharga said.

One of every 339 homes in Colorado is in foreclosure, but the percentage of homes owned by lenders is below the national average of 19.6 percent, Sharga said.

In the past 12 months, the inventory of unsold homes in the seven-county metro area has gone from about 23,000 to more than 27,300, said Mike Rinner, a senior real-estate analyst with the Genesis Group in Englewood.

Should buyers not step up in sufficient numbers over the coming weeks to purchase the homes in foreclosure, lenders could be forced to unload them at below-market prices. That would make it more difficult for other home sellers to get their asking price, lengthen the time homes spend on the market and cause the already-high count of unsold homes to grow.

Entry-level housing markets away from job centers such as the Denver Tech Center, downtown Denver and the Boulder corridor have proved the most vulnerable, Rinner said.

Adams and Arapahoe counties are suffering the highest foreclosure rates in the state, while higher-end markets such as Boulder and Douglas counties are holding up much better.

A foreclosure can take about six months, and many lenders are willing to work with homeowners to keep them in their homes or get them out with the least damage to both sides.

"The saddest thing I see is that people don't know they have options," said Lori Strange, director of planning and resource development at the Adams County Housing Authority.

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, for example, is willing to take whatever proceeds a homebuyer can get in a sale, even if it doesn't cover the mortgage.

originally published April 26, 2006

Read More...

Will Iran carry out the next Holocaust?

Washington Post
Never Again?
By Charles Krauthammer

When something happens for the first time in 1,871
years, it is worth noting. In A.D. 70, and again in
135, the Roman Empire brutally put down Jewish revolts
in Judea, destroying Jerusalem, killing hundreds of
thousands of Jews and sending hundreds of thousands
more into slavery and exile. For nearly two millennia,
the Jews wandered the world. And now, in 2006, for the
first time since then, there are once again more Jews
living in Israel -- the successor state to Judea --
than in any other place on Earth.

Israel's Jewish population has just passed 5.6
million. America's Jewish population was about 5.5
million in 1990, dropped to about 5.2 million 10 years
later and is in a precipitous decline that, because of
low fertility rates and high levels of assimilation,
will cut that number in half by mid-century.

When 6 million European Jews were killed in the
Holocaust, only two main centers of Jewish life
remained: America and Israel. That binary star system
remains today, but a tipping point has just been
reached. With every year, as the Jewish population
continues to rise in Israel and decline in America
(and in the rest of the Diaspora), Israel increasingly
becomes, as it was at the time of Jesus, the center of
the Jewish world.

An epic restoration, and one of the most improbable.
To take just one of the remarkable achievements of the
return: Hebrew is the only "dead" language in recorded
history to have been brought back to daily use as the
living language of a nation. But there is a price and
a danger to this transformation. It radically alters
the prospects for Jewish survival.

For 2,000 years, Jews found protection in dispersion
-- protection not for individual communities, which
were routinely persecuted and massacred, but
protection for the Jewish people as a whole. Decimated
here, they could survive there. They could be
persecuted in Spain and find refuge in Constantinople.
They could be massacred in the Rhineland during the
Crusades or in the Ukraine during the Khmelnytsky
Insurrection of 1648-49 and yet survive in the rest of
Europe.

Hitler put an end to that illusion. He demonstrated
that modern anti-Semitism married to modern technology
-- railroads, disciplined bureaucracies, gas chambers
that kill with industrial efficiency -- could take a
scattered people and "concentrate" them for
annihilation.

The establishment of Israel was a Jewish declaration
to a world that had allowed the Holocaust to happen --
after Hitler had made his intentions perfectly clear
-- that the Jews would henceforth resort to
self-protection and self-reliance. And so they have,
building a Jewish army, the first in 2,000 years, that
prevailed in three great wars of survival (1948-49,
1967 and 1973).

But in a cruel historical irony, doing so required
concentration -- putting all the eggs back in one
basket, a tiny territory hard by the Mediterranean,
eight miles wide at its waist. A tempting target for
those who would finish Hitler's work.

His successors now reside in Tehran. The world has
paid ample attention to President Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad's declaration that Israel must be
destroyed. Less attention has been paid to Iranian
leaders' pronouncements on exactly how Israel would be
"eliminated by one storm," as Ahmadinejad has
promised.

Former president Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, the
presumed moderate of this gang, has explained that
"the use of a nuclear bomb in Israel will leave
nothing on the ground, whereas it will only damage the
world of Islam." The logic is impeccable, the
intention clear: A nuclear attack would effectively
destroy tiny Israel, while any retaliation launched by
a dying Israel would have no major effect on an
Islamic civilization of a billion people stretching
from Mauritania to Indonesia.

As it races to acquire nuclear weapons, Iran makes
clear that if there is any trouble, the Jews will be
the first to suffer. "We have announced that wherever
[in Iran] America does make any mischief, the first
place we target will be Israel," said Gen. Mohammad
Ebrahim Dehghani, a top Revolutionary Guards
commander. Hitler was only slightly more direct when
he announced seven months before invading Poland that,
if there was another war, "the result will be . . .
the annihilation of the Jewish race in Europe."

Last week Bernard Lewis, America's dean of Islamic
studies, who just turned 90 and remembers the 20th
century well, confessed that for the first time he
feels it is 1938 again. He did not need to add that in
1938, in the face of the gathering storm -- a
fanatical, aggressive, openly declared enemy of the
West, and most determinedly of the Jews -- the world
did nothing.

When Iran's mullahs acquire their coveted nukes in the
next few years, the number of Jews in Israel will just
be reaching 6 million. Never again?

originally published Friday, May 5, 2006

Read More...

Another Misleading Republican Attack In California

factcheck.org
Another Misleading Republican Attack In California

An NRCC ad says Democrat Francine Busby "praised a teacher reported to have child porn," but fails to mention she voted to fire him.

Summary

A National Republican Congressional Committee television advertisement says California House Democratic Candidate Francine Busby "praised a teacher reported to have child porn saying he was always willing to lend a hand."

The ad calls that "dangerous," but it fails to tell the whole story. In fact, Busby had acted months earlier as a member of California's Cardiff School Board to strip the teacher of his teaching license.

The ad also says "with Busby on the school board the district's deficit sky-rocketed" and that "Busby voted to lay off teachers." Those statements give a misleading picture. While the ad faults Busby for "poor judgment" and "poor management," the fact is that the school district had a comfortable cash reserve every year Busby served on the board. The five lay-offs resulted from funding cuts by the state and produced almost no change in pupil-teacher ratios.
Analysis

The NRCC released another 30-second television ad attacking Democratic House candidate Francine Busby of California. It first aired April 21 in the San Diego media market. A special election to fill the House seat vacated by former Republican Rep. Randy “Duke” Cunningham takes place June 6.

NRCC Ad: "Busby Poor Record"

Announcer: Francine Busby's record? With Busby on the school board the district's deficit sky-rocketed by over 250 per cent. That's poor management.
(On Screen: footage of Francine Busby behind a microphone.)
Announcer: Busby voted to lay off teachers but gave raises to administrative bureaucrats. That's poor judgment.
(On Screen: footage of Francine Busby applauding with screen text saying, "Praised teacher reported to have Child Porn.")
Announcer: Busby even praised a teacher reported to have child porn saying he was always willing to lend a hand. That's dangerous.
Announcer: Liberal Francine Busby, poor management, poor judgment, dangerous.
Announcer: The National Republican Congressional Committee is reponsible for the content of this advertising.

The ad, titled “Busby Poor Record,” mischaracterizes Busby’s work as a member of California’s Cardiff School Board from 2001 to 2006. Cardiff, an affluent town 30 miles outside San Diego, consists of two elementary schools with a current total of 741 students.

Praised for Having Child Porn?

The NRCC ad says that Busby “praised a teacher reported to have child porn saying he was always willing to lend a hand. That's dangerous.” It is true that Busby said this about former California elementary school teacher Dale Regazzi, but she also expressed shock at the allegations and had previously acted to get him out of teaching entirely.

An April 2004 report in the San Diego Union-Tribune quotes Busby speaking about Regazzi after he had been investigated and charged with attempting to possess child pornography and destroying evidence:

Busby: He is a teacher who put in a lot of extra time…he was always willing to lend a hand. I am shocked about the investigation.

The school board stripped Regazzi of his teaching credentials when they were told about the investigation in September 2003. The Union-Tribune reported investigators found evidence of child pornography in Regazzi’s trash can. Regazzi pleaded guilty to destruction of evidence as part of a plea deal, and was sentenced to one year probation. The newspaper said that as of February 2006 Regazzi was a truck driver.

Administrators’ Salaries at Teachers’ Expense?

The NRCC ad says that “Busby voted to lay off teachers but gave raises to administrative bureaucrats. That's poor judgment.” Busby did participate in a unanimous vote to approve a 3 per cent raise for supervisors and non-teaching staff employees in 2003, but the ad fails to mention that teachers got the same 3 per cent raise. The raise did not affect Busby or other school board members, who get a $120 monthly stipend.

It is also true that the board sent lay-off notices to 23 teachers in anticipation of large funding cuts by the state. But local newspapers reported that the cuts turned out to be smaller than at first thought, and school officials say ultimately only five teachers were let go. Despite that, pupil-teacher ratios hardly suffered, going from 17.8 students per teacher in 2002-2003 school year to 18.0 the following year, according to the Education Data Partnership website Ed-Data. Cardiff managed this by shedding out-of-district pupils for whom the state cut funding.

It Depends on How You Define Deficit

The NRCC ad says that “with Busby on the School Board the district’s deficit sky-rocketed by over 250 per cent.” The ad is correct as far as it goes, but ignores the Cardiff school district's large cash reserves.

By law, California school districts are not allowed to borrow money to finance their operating costs. The Cardiff school district is no exception. According to a budget summary supplied to FactCheck.org by the school district's Director of Finance, Sandie Luehrs, the district's expenditures were higher than its revenue from 2001 to 2005, and in that sense ran a deficit in the most recent four years. Nevertheless, the district ended each year with a positive balance, not a negative one:

Cardiff School Board Budget Summary by School Year

















































School Years 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005
Beginning Balance $950,458 $1,185,433 $988,550 $891,888 $536,041
Revenue $5,847,682 $5,987,178 $6,130,560 $5,846,238.00 $6,164,985.00
Expenditures $5,612,707 $6,184,061 $6,227,222 $6,202,085.00 $6,220,732.00
Excess/Deficit $234,975 ($196,883) ($96,662) ($355,847) ($55,747)
Ending Balance $1,185,433 $988,550 $891,888 $536,041 $480,294


Source: Sandie Luehrs, Director of Finance, Cardiff School District

The "over 250 per cent" rise in the deficit refers to the years between 2002 and 2004, when the deficit indeed increased by 268 per cent. However, the deficit also declined by 84.3 per cent the following year.

-by Emi Kolawole
Sources

Friedrich, Alex. "Local Schools Pleased by Smaller Budget cuts,'" The Monterey County Herald. 30 July 2003.

Mihailovich, Steven. "More School Layoffs," The Coast News. 17 April 2003.

Jimenez, Jose Luis. "Ex-teacher strikes deal in porn case," The San Diego Union-Tribune. 7 February 2006.

Parmet, Sherry. "Cardiff teacher faces child-porn accusations; State commission suspends credential," The San Diego Union-Tribune. 29 April 2004.

Parmet, Sherry. "Cardiffy may turn away some pupils; Funding change affects interdistrict students," The San Diego Union-Tribune. 31 May 2003.

"School District to halt transfers," The San Diego Union-Tribune. 11 June 2003.

"NRCC: More Lies, More Slander." Francine Busby for Congress. News Release. 25 April 2006.


Read More...

Wednesday, May 10, 2006

Every American Should See LOOSE CHANGE Today!

The Huffington Post
Every American Should See LOOSE CHANGE Today!
Jason Pollock

I recently watched the film LOOSE CHANGE and couldn't believe what I learned. I thought that I had read and heard everything about 9/11, but I was wrong. This film makes quite a case for an alternate view of what happened on September 11th, 2001.

I found two major media sources that have written about this film so far.
USA Today gave it the biggest write-up to date.

The NY Times also made mention of it.

I watched the entire film on the internet. I dont think many people realize the power of the internet. To distribute a film such as this on the world wide web was simply brilliant. It never would have gotten the backing it needed from a major studio. The internet affords anyone the opportunity to see it, and everyone needs to! In this day and age of information traveling as quickly as it does, hopefully these simple facts from September 11th will reach a greater audience.

I think that any American who has the resources of high-speed internet should not wait one more second to watch this film. If you don't have high-speed at your house then go to the library. I guarantee you that you will see and hear things that will blow your mind.

I'm not saying that I agree with everything in the film or that it is a perfect piece of filmmaking. However, it does make some incredibly compelling cases about a few things from 9/11 over which i have certainly lost sleep.

For example, the film shows beyond a shadow of a doubt that the World Trade Center buildings collapsed because there were explosions all the way down. There is no way that a fire caused the buildings to collapse. You can see in the video, which we have all seen 1 million times, that each floor explodes as the towers collapse to the ground.

The filmmakers have obvioulsy spent an enormous amount of time researching and going through an immense amount of evidencount of evidence from that day. What they found is very different from what our leaders are telling us.

Another thing that has been hotly contested but virtually proven in this film is that the Pentagon was not hit by a regular-sized passenger plane. What did hit the Pentagon then? Was it a missile? I ask you to watch this film and make your own conclusions.

One thing that the film made me ask was why haven't our leaders raised these questions yet? Why did it have to take a movie that was essentially distributed on the internet to raise these simple questions?

Where are our senators and congressman now? Why aren't they doing more to raise these issues? Why haven't they taken the time to do the research that needs to be done to get to the bottom of one of the most tragic days in American history?

If any politicians are reading this right now, I implore you to take a look at this film and do something about these issues immediately. It is not about your reputation or your poll numbers. Doing what is right will gain the respect of the people every time.

I think that we should all demand answers from our government and our leaders about 9/11. These issues are not too old to re-hash and we as Americans owe it to ourselves and to the history books to get to the bottom of what really happened on September 11th, 2001. I for one am not satisfied with what we have been told.

Frankly, given Bush's track record during his presidency, I feel we should probably be taking another look at almost everything that has come out of his mouth. September 11th is an American tragedy of monumental proportions and its not enough to just file it away and say that we got to the bottom of that one.

In this day and age where information is being passed around at an incredible rate, maybe we can get some truths out of our government that we were not able to in the past.

Kennedy was assassinated with a "magic" bullet. America has essentially accepted this. I won't even go there, but I will say that we need to take a hard look at what happened on September 11th and this film is a first step in that direction.

Watch the film and make up your own mind.


Read More...

Suicide Truck Bomber Kills 17 in Iraq

Yahoo! News
Suicide Truck Bomber Kills 17 in Iraq
By ROBERT H. REID, Associated Press Writer

A suicide truck bomber attacked a crowded market in Tal Afar late Tuesday, killing at least 17 people and wounding 35 in a city cited by President Bush as a success story in battling insurgents.

The bombing occurred after incoming Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki said he had almost finished assembling a Cabinet, the final step in establishing a national unity government. U.S. officials had predicted insurgents would step up attacks to try to block the new administration.

U.S. Ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad said al-Maliki would soon launch a four-part plan to restore order by securing Baghdad, Basra and eight other cities, promoting reconciliation, building public confidence in the police and army and disbanding sectarian militias.

The truck bomber struck about 8:30 p.m. as shoppers in Tal Afar were scurrying to finish their purchases before closing, according to police Col. Abdul-Karim Mohammed, who gave the casualty figures.

The director of the city hospital, Saleh Qado, said 20 people were killed and 70 wounded, and that U.S. Army medics provided emergency treatment at the scene before loading the injured into ambulances.

Lt. Col. Ali Rasheed of the Interior Ministry said the main target may have been a police station within the market area of the city, 260 miles northwest of Baghdad.

At least 500 Iraqis have been killed by vehicle bombs in 2006, out of a total of at least 3,525 Iraqis killed in war-related violence this year. These numbers include civilians, government officials, and police and security officials, and are considered only a minimum based on Associated Press reporting.

In March, Bush praised American efforts to stabilize Tal Afar, saying he had "confidence in our strategy" and that success in the city "gives reason for hope for a free Iraq."

U.S. and Iraqi forces launched an operation in September to clear the city of insurgents — the second such attempt in a year. However, by the end of September, a woman suicide bomber slipped into a crowd of recruits, killing at least six people and wounding 30. Since then, the city has been hit by repeated suicide attacks.

Tal Afar's population is a volatile mix of Turkomen, Kurds and Arabs, which complicates efforts to control the city. Trouble started in 2003 when Kurdish fighters took over Tal Afar, angering the majority Turkomen population. Insurgents are also believed to have used Tal Afar as a hub for smuggling weapons and fighters from Syria, about 90 miles to the west.

Also Tuesday, the U.S. command reported that an American soldier was killed the day before in a bombing in Baghdad. At least 2,423 members of the U.S. military have died since the Iraq war started in March 2003, according to an AP count.

DynCorp International announced that one of its American employees, Rudy Mesa, was killed in the same attack. Mesa, an Army veteran and retired police officer in San Marcos, Texas, had been training Iraqi police, DynCorps said.

Such attacks have added urgency to the task of finalizing a government that will include Shiites, Sunnis and Kurds. The Bush administration hopes such a government can calm sectarian tensions and lure disaffected Sunnis away from the insurgency so U.S. troops can begin heading home.

Al-Maliki said he expects to complete his Cabinet within a few days — the final step in establishing the government. Al-Maliki told reporters that representatives of the country's political parties had agreed on what factions would hold the "main posts," including the Interior Ministry long under fire for alleged human rights abuses against Sunni Arabs.

The Shiite alliance was expected to retain the Interior Ministry and give the post to its controversial incumbent, Bayan Jabr of the Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq, according to several Iraqi officials who spoke on condition of anonymity because the deliberations are secret.

Sunnis have sharply criticized Jabr's ministry for alleged human rights abuses, including the kidnapping, torture and killings of civilians. Many Sunnis believe Interior Ministry forces have been infiltrated by Shiite militias.

The Kurds said they had no objection to Jabr, but Shiite officials said they were meeting resistance from Sunni Arabs, who believed they had received assurances that the Shiites would nominate an independent rather than a member of one of the big Shiite parties.

In an interview Monday with the AP, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said "everybody knows that the Interior Ministry is a problem" and must not be "used for sectarian purposes." She stopped short of opposing Shiite control.

"But the Iraqis have said that they want the choice of the so-called power ministries, the critical ministries, to be based on competence and based on the ability of the people to gain broad confidence, not on party affiliations," Rice said.

Al-Maliki has promised to appoint defense and interior ministers without ties to militias. In Iraq, however, virtually every major militia leader denies he runs a militia. Jabr's Supreme Council insists it converted its Badr Brigade into an unarmed political organization, a claim widely disputed by Sunnis.

Shiite independent Hussain al-Shahristani, a former nuclear physicist who lived for years in exile in Canada, was the top candidate to head the oil ministry, officials said.

While the politicians haggled, the killings continued.

The bodies of 17 Iraqis were found Tuesday, police said, apparent victims of sectarian death squads. Police said five were found in the capital; one in northern Iraq; eight, including a 10-year-old boy, in a river 30 miles south of Baghdad; and three Interior Ministry police commandos were found dead in Mahawil, 45 miles south of the capital.

In other violence Tuesday, according to police:

• Four people were killed in drive-by shootings in Baghdad, including a Sunni cleric.

• A roadside bomb killed one policeman and wounded two in the capital.

• Two security guards were killed by unknown gunmen at an oil refinery in Basra.

___

Associated Press correspondents Tarek El-Tablawy and Qassim Abdul-Zahra contributed to this report.



Read More...

Another Possible Bump to the Debt Ceiling

washingtonpost.com
Another Possible Bump to the Debt Ceiling
By Jonathan Weisman and Shailagh Murray

A $2.7 trillion budget plan pending before the House would raise the federal debt ceiling to nearly $10 trillion, less than two months after Congress last raised the federal government's borrowing limit.

The provision -- buried on page 121 of the 151-page budget blueprint -- serves as a backdrop to congressional action this week. House leaders hope to try once again to pass a budget plan for fiscal 2007, a month after a revolt by House Republican moderates and Appropriations Committee members forced leaders to pull the plan.

Leaders also hope to pass a package of tax-cut extensions that would cost the Treasury $70 billion over the next five years. They would then turn Thursday to a $513 billion defense policy bill that would block President Bush's request to raise health-care fees and co-payments for service members and their families.

In recent days, Congress has received some good news on the budget front. A surge of tax revenues this spring, sparked by economic growth, prompted the Congressional Budget Office last Thursday to revise its 2006 deficit forecast from around $370 billion to as low as $300 billion.

But the federal debt keeps climbing because of continued deficit spending and the government's insatiable borrowing from the Social Security trust fund.

With passage of the budget, the House will have raised the federal borrowing limit by an additional $653 billion, to $9.62 trillion. It would be the fifth debt-ceiling increase in recent years, after boosts of $450 billion in 2002, a record $984 billion in 2003, $800 billion in 2004 and $653 billion in March. When Bush took office, the statutory borrowing limit stood at $5.95 trillion.

Democrats will harp on those statistics not only in the budget debate but also when the House takes up tax legislation expected to finally emerge from House-Senate negotiations today. The legislation would extend for two years the deep cuts to tax rates on dividends and capital gains that Congress approved in 2003. It would also slow for one year the expansion of the alternative minimum tax, a parallel income tax system designed to hit the affluent but increasingly pinching the middle class.

Although the debate will be rancorous, the tax measure is expected to pass by a comfortable margin. The budget vote will be closer. House leaders had to pull the budget plan from the floor in April, after moderate Republicans balked at planned cuts to health and education programs and appropriators objected to limits on home district pet projects -- known as earmarks -- and a provision that would limit emergency spending for natural disasters to about $4.3 billion a year.

Appropriators have come on board, Appropriations Committee spokesman John Scofield said. GOP leaders and committee chairman Jerry Lewis (R-Calif.) tried to win moderate support last week by cutting $4 billion from the president's defense spending request and adding that money to labor, health and education programs. But some moderates are still holding out.

"I expect they do not have the votes right now," said Rep. Michael N. Castle (R-Del.), a leader of the balking moderates. "Could they get the votes by the end of the week? I'd give it a 50-50 chance."
GOP Health-Care Redux

It's "health week" in the Senate, but don't expect any big policy cures.

Republicans are seeking to pass legislation that would restrict malpractice awards and encourage insurance pools among small businesses. The three bills are GOP perennials that in the past have met with staunch opposition by Democrats and interest groups.

Given the high stakes of the midterm election year, the prospects this week don't look any brighter. Two of the bills, both aimed at limiting medical malpractice jury awards, stalled in the Senate last night after failing to gain enough votes to overcome Democratic-led procedural hurdles.

The first measure, sponsored by Sen. John Ensign (R-Nev.), would allow up to $750,000 for non-economic damages and unlimited economic damages. A patient could recover up to $250,000 from a health-care provider and up to two health-care institutions each for a total of $750,000.

The bill also would guarantee timely resolution of claims by mandating that health-care lawsuits are filed within three years of the date of injury, establish standards for expert witnesses and limit attorneys' fees.

The second measure would target lawsuits against obstetric and gynecological providers and was sponsored by Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Pa.), whose wife won $175,000 in damages in a malpractice case against a chiropractor.

Democrats mocked the bills as a gimmick designed to rally conservative voters and appease doctors and insurance companies. "This is not a serious attempt," said Sen. Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass.).

The third bill up this week, offered by Sen. Mike Enzi (R-Wyo.), would allow business and trade associations to band their members together and offer group health coverage on a national or regional basis. Opponents warn that it would set the "barest of bare bones standards for benefits," as one Democratic press release put it, undercutting requirements to cover cancer screening, well-baby care, immunization, access to specialists and other services.



Read More...

An Agriprop Guide to Cluck and Awe

The New York Times
An Agriprop Guide to Cluck and Awe

A furious collective heehaw is surely the only proper response to the news that ranking bureaucrats and other occasional speechmakers at the Department of Agriculture have been instructed to include "talking points" of praise for President Bush's handling of the Iraq war in their routine rhetorical fodder.

Detailed instructions on how to segue from, say, domestic soybean production to Mesopotamian nation-building were e-mailed to scores of department workers. Included was a caution that speechmakers should keep a record of their compliance, and turn in point-scoring summaries to be tallied for weekly reports to the White House.

The news of this latest exercise in Orwellian cravenness was broken by Al Kamen, the Washington Post columnist long trusted by the capital's career bureaucracy as an outlet for leaking the slings and arrows of political appointees pitching spin.

The suggested talking points for agency workers to use before farm and agribusiness audiences include the poultry angle: pointing out that Iraqi farmers use U.S. aid to buy American feed and are working to "update 25-year-old chicken houses" as national stability takes hold. A barnyard stemwinder could deal with the ticklish subject of civil rights by noting that Iraq "has been evolving for 230 years" and is "still working to become a more perfect union" with the administration's help.

And there's nothing like a fresh back story in the war on terror. "Iraq is part of the 'fertile crescent' of Mesopotamia," where mankind first domesticated wheat thousands of years ago, this suggestion begins. Then it moves to the clincher: "In recent years, however, the birthplace of farming has been in trouble."




Read More...

Barely Staying Afloat

The New York Times
Barely Staying Afloat

President Bush's advisers say that the administration should receive more credit for the state of the economy, which, over all, is growing at a strong clip. But voters don't base their opinions on aggregate statistics. They react to their own paychecks and benefits, weighed against their fixed costs, like housing, health care and gasoline. For all but the wealthiest Americans, the latter are rapidly outpacing the former.

In a time of plenty, more American workers are in danger of slipping into outright poverty. As Erik Eckholm reported this week in The Times, about 37 million Americans lived below the poverty line in 2004: $19,157 a year for a family of four. An additional 54 million lived between the poverty line and double the poverty line: $38,314 for a family of that size. They are the "near poor," and they generally receive little attention. But they are often one injury or layoff away from slipping into poverty themselves.

If the "near poor" feel insecure, they have good reason to. A group of academics found that during the 1980's, 13 percent of Americans in their 40's spent a year or more below the poverty line. In the 1990's, that percentage nearly tripled, reaching 36 percent. While workers once believed that pensions would provide for them in their old age, now they fret over underfunded 401(k) accounts. Houses are supposed to provide stability, but those with adjustable-rate mortgages are watching their payments rise, and some fear losing their homes.

The issue here is not handouts; it's about buffering against the shocks inherent in a fast-paced global economy. Perhaps one of the reasons President Bush is generally regarded as such a poor economic steward is that his administration has done little to make the most vulnerable members of the working class believe that any of the good news is directed at them.



Read More...