Wednesday, June 07, 2006

Block the Vote, Ohio Remix

The New York Times
Block the Vote, Ohio Remix

If there was ever a sign of a ruling party in trouble, it is a game plan that calls for trying to win by discouraging voting.

The latest sign that Republicans have an election-year strategy to shut down voter registration drives comes from Ohio. As the state gears up for a very competitive election season this fall, its secretary of state, J. Kenneth Blackwell, has put in place "emergency" regulations that could hit voter registration workers with criminal penalties for perfectly legitimate registration practices. The rules are so draconian they could shut down registration drives in Ohio.

Mr. Blackwell, who also happens to be the Republican candidate for governor this year, has a history of this sort of behavior. In 2004, he instructed county boards of elections to reject any registrations on paper of less than 80-pound stock — about the thickness of a postcard. His order was almost certainly illegal, and he retracted it after he came under intense criticism. It was, however, in place long enough to get some registrations tossed out.

This year, Mr. Blackwell's office has issued rules and materials that appear to require that paid registration workers, and perhaps even volunteers, personally take the forms they collect to an election office. Organizations that run registration drives generally have the people who register voters bring the forms back to supervisors, who can then review them for errors. Under Mr. Blackwell's edict, everyone involved could be committing a crime. Mr. Blackwell's rules also appear to prohibit people who register voters from sending the forms in by mail. That rule itself may violate federal elections law.

Mr. Blackwell's rules are interpretations of a law the Republican-controlled Ohio Legislature passed recently. Another of the nation's most famous swing states, Florida, has been the scene of similar consternation and confusion since it recently enacted a law that is so harsh that the Florida League of Women Voters announced that it was stopping all voter registration efforts for the first time in 67 years.

Florida's Legislature, like Ohio's, is controlled by Republicans. Throughout American history both parties have shown a willingness to try to use election law to get results they might otherwise not win at the polls. But right now it is clearly the Republicans who believe they have an interest in keeping the voter base small. Mr. Blackwell and other politicians who insist on making it harder to vote never say, of course, that they are worried that get-out-the-vote drives will bring too many poor and minority voters into the system. They say that they want to reduce fraud. However, there is virtually no evidence that registration drives are leading to fraud at the polls.

But there is one clear way that Ohio's election system is corrupt. Decisions about who can vote are being made by a candidate for governor. Mr. Blackwell should hand over responsibility for elections to a decision maker whose only loyalty is to the voters and the law.





Read More...

Katherine Harris Presses On

The New York Times
Senate Contender in Florida Presses On
By MARK LEIBOVICH

VENICE, Fla. — Undaunted by a run of horrific poll numbers, staff turmoil and public doubts from leaders of her party, Representative Katherine Harris is thinking confidently beyond November.

Once Ms. Harris wins her race for a Senate seat, she says, she plans to travel everywhere with a guide dog.

"Before I hire anyone to work for me in the Senate, I tell them I'm going to do this," said Ms. Harris, the former Florida secretary of state best — or worst — remembered for her role in the state's election recount of 2000.

Ms. Harris explains that she intends to participate in a program that provides guide dogs for volunteers to train. While cynics may assign unflattering symbolism to a politician who is not blind being led around the Capitol by a guide dog, Ms. Harris is undeterred — by this or by the perception that her role in 2000 makes her too divisive to lure the swing voters necessary to defeat the incumbent Democrat, Bill Nelson.

In her insistence on running, Ms. Harris has become something of a pariah among many of the people whose power she indirectly helped ensure five and a half years ago, as overseer of the recount that sealed George W. Bush's victory.

Top White House officials, Republican operatives and Gov. Jeb Bush of Florida have urged her not to run. When Ms. Harris ignored those entreaties, a Who's Who of national Republicans begged a Who's Who of Florida Republicans to oppose her in the primary, to no avail.

Her campaign has been marked by aides leaving en masse, disclosures of her ties to a contractor caught up in a lobbying scandal and the fund-raising handicaps inherent to any enterprise perceived as a lost cause or, worse, a joke.

Ed Rollins, one of Ms. Harris's many former campaign consultants, claimed she had told him that God wanted her to stay in the race. (Ms. Harris denies making the statement.)

She promised to finance her campaign with $10 million of her own money. Popular wisdom says that will not matter. Mr. Nelson led Ms. Harris by more than 30 points in recent polls.

"She has absolutely no chance of winning," said former Representative Joe Scarborough, a Pensacola Republican who was courted strongly by the National Republican Senatorial Committee to oppose Ms. Harris but declined. Mr. Scarborough, the host of "Scarborough Country" on MSNBC, said Ms. Harris "seems to be detached from reality these days."

Because of her role in the 2000 recount, Ms. Harris still enjoys devotion from many Florida Republicans, enough to make her the likely winner over three little-known opponents for her party's nomination. Her supporters applaud avidly at Republican events and cannot understand her sudden unpopularity among party leaders.

"She acted exactly the way the Republicans wanted her to act," said Stanley Tate, a Miami businessman who serves as her campaign's finance chairman. Mr. Tate said he was "completely confused" by the party establishment's snubbing of Ms. Harris. He tells of a recent Republican dinner in Miami where Ms. Harris received a standing ovation from the crowd yet was not acknowledged in a speech by Governor Bush.

On Memorial Day, Ms. Harris rode in a parade and visited two Veterans of Foreign Wars halls and one American Legion post, and was not audibly jeered or heckled by anyone, a fact that surprises even her, "based on the press I get."

Between stops, Ms. Harris portrays herself as something of a populist under siege from "Washington Republicans" and a liberal news media. "I don't have the Beltway mentality," she said. "And I never go along to get along. So I think it's a little threatening to those in power."

She said that given the difficult environment for incumbent Republicans in November, it could be an asset to be perceived as a nonfavorite of the party establishment.

"O.K., so President Bush does not support her," said Representative John L. Mica, a Florida Republican who is close to Ms. Harris. "President Bush is at 30 percent." Mr. Mica added that Ms. Harris was previously criticized for being "a tool of the Bushes," which should not be a problem anymore.

Even so, the role of anti-establishment figure is unusual for Ms. Harris, the product of a well-to-do Central Florida family and a granddaughter of a cattle and citrus baron. She became a well-known socialite in the Sarasota area and has long been active in the state's Republican Party. She is married to a Swedish businessman, Anders Ebbeson, and they have listed assets of as much as $37 million.

In Congress, Ms. Harris has been a reliable ally of the Bush administration on issues like tax cuts, Iraq and opposition to same-sex marriage. She has done little in her three-and-a-half-year tenure to win notice beyond her district — one exception being a speech in which she spoke of a foiled terrorist plot against the city of Carmel, Ind. (Federal officials said the plot never existed; Ms. Harris later said she had heard of it secondhand.)

The belief among top Republicans was that Ms. Harris's presence in 2006 would galvanize Democrats still eager for revenge after 2000.

"The campaign can't be about her," Governor Bush told reporters last month. "I gave her that exact advice. Since then, it's gotten worse."

Like most politicians who are behind in polls, Ms. Harris says she does not pay attention to them. But she cited her own "internal polls," which she said showed that she could get 53 percent of the vote "if my base turns out."

She says she has moved on from a string of fiascoes early this year, including the disclosure that a military contractor who has pleaded guilty to bribery in the corruption case involving former Representative Randy Cunningham has also admitted to making $32,000 in illegal donations to Ms. Harris's campaign. She has said she had no idea the contributions were illegal; she donated the money to charity.

She has also seen a drain of top aides, campaign managers and consultants, many complaining on the way out the door about her management style and unwillingness to follow their advice (including not to run).

Ms. Harris says voters are indifferent to stories about staff turnover. What matters, she said, is "my total commitment to Floridians" and "getting the word out about how liberal Bill Nelson is."

In interviews, Ms. Harris projects a somewhat frenetic personality, speaking in rapid-fire cadences, fussing incessantly with her hair and barraging aides with questions and road directions ("We have a detour to Starbucks on the way. ... Quickest way to Venice is down Fruitville"). Sometimes she will burst forth midsentence upon noticing something out the window ("Hey, there's one of my bumper stickers!").

She attributes much of how she is viewed to the "silliness" of the media. This dates from 2000, when Ms. Harris's perceived overapplication of makeup became a recurring punch line.

"They had trucks in Florida bringing the ballots to Tallahassee," Jay Leno said on "The Tonight Show." "In fact, it's the same trucks they used to bring the makeup to Florida Secretary of State Katherine Harris."

Ms. Harris is adamant in her claim that news organizations have doctored photographs to exaggerate the amount of makeup she wears. "I haven't worn blue makeup since seventh grade," she said, referring to photographs she said she had seen of herself on the Internet.

She is especially animated when the topic turns to animals, including the guide dog she plans to train starting in November. She will care for the dog for 18 months, spending nearly all her waking hours with it. "You can't let them sleep in bed with you," Ms. Harris said. "Which is going to be harder on me than the dog."

When a supporter in a Venice veterans hall said he once witnessed Ms. Harris leave her vehicle to escort a turtle across a highway, she became gravely serious.

"All of my life I have stopped for turtles," she said firmly, even defensively, as if someone had challenged her commitment to turtle safety.

As Ms. Harris hugged and hand-shaked her way toward the hall exit, the song "Y.M.C.A." came on. The mostly empty dance floor filled with aging veterans and their wives, one of whom spotted Ms. Harris and summoned her.

She obliged. And then commenced another unforgettable moment, Katherine Harris, arms over her head, dancing to "Y.M.C.A."




Read More...

A report into secret US flights for terror suspects is expected to conclude that 14 European countries colluded with the CIA

BBC NEWS
Europe 'connived in CIA flights'
A report into secret US flights for terror suspects is expected to conclude that 14 European countries colluded with the CIA.

The document will be presented to the Council of Europe by Swiss MP Dick Marty after a seven-month inquiry.

An advance copy seen by the BBC says there is also evidence to support suspicions that secret CIA camps are or were located in Poland and Romania.

The two countries have strongly denied the allegation in the past.

The BBC's Tim Franks in Paris - where the report will be issued on Wednesday - says the charges are potentially explosive but the difficulty remains in securing the proof.

'Alien approach'

The report is quoted as saying: "It is now clear - although we are still far from having established the truth - that authorities in several European countries actively participated with the CIA in these unlawful activities."

According to the advance copy, countries such as Spain, Turkey, Britain, Germany and Cyprus provided "staging posts" for rendition operations.

Mr Marty is said to have concluded that the "spider's web" of US rendition flights is based on an "utterly alien" approach that breaches human rights.

The most serious charges are reportedly levelled at Poland and Romania, where Mr Marty says there is enough evidence to support suspicions that CIA secret prisons were established.

Human rights groups have criticised renditions for exposing detainees to the risk of torture.

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/europe/5054426.stm


Read More...

CIA suppressed Eichmann whereabouts

Reuters
CIA suppressed Eichmann whereabouts: report
By David Morgan

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The CIA suppressed the whereabouts of Nazi war criminal Adolf Eichmann to help protect high ranking West German officials from possible revelations about their own Nazi pasts, according to CIA documents released on Tuesday.

A March 1958 memo from West German intelligence informed the CIA that Eichmann, the senior Gestapo officer who oversaw Hitler's "Final Solution" to annihilate European Jewry, was living under the alias "Clemens" in Argentina where he had arrived seven years earlier, the documents show.

"It now appears that West Germany could have captured him in 1958, if it wished to," said University of Virginia historian Timothy Naftali, director of the Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum.

"Newly released CIA materials suggest that in the highest levels of the Konrad Adenauer government, there was concern about what Eichmann could say if caught about those close to the chancellor."

He was speaking at a news conference where a government working group headed by the National Archives announced the release of 27,000 pages of CIA documents relating to the spy agency's ties to former Nazis, including war criminals.

The CIA also could have passed along the information to Israeli intelligence, which was ending its own search for Eichmann in Argentina when the U.S. spy agency received word of his whereabouts from West Germany.

It was not U.S. policy at the time to pursue former Nazis, who were still being recruited as Cold War spies against the Soviet Union.

The Israelis finally captured Eichmann in Argentina in 1960. He was tried in Jerusalem for crimes against the Jewish people, found guilty and hanged in 1962.

But Naftali said the CIA also helped West Germany to suppress part of Eichmann's diary that could have embarrassed Adenauer's national security adviser, Hans Globke, himself a former Nazi.

Eichmann's family had sold the Nazi fugitive's memoirs to Life magazine to raise money for his defense.

West Germany officials asked the CIA to help suppress the document.

"The CIA explained that they could not stop publication but persuaded Life (magazine) to delete the one reference to Globke in the excerpts the magazine was planning to publish," Naftali said.

"The CIA, which worked closely with Globke, assisted the West Germans in protecting him from Eichmann," he said.

About 8 million pages of documents from agencies that also include the FBI and the Defense Department have been declassified under the disclosure act.

The working group established by the disclosure act is also examining federal government affiliations with war criminals from Imperial Japan.

The CIA had previously released more than 1.2 million pages of documents relating to former Nazis in compliance with the Nazi War Crimes Disclosure Act of 1998.

The historians, who examined newly released CIA documents, told a news conference that America's use of war criminals in Cold War intelligence mainly produced unreliable information, sometimes with disastrous consequences for U.S. interests.

"We have not found any evidence that hiring these tainted individuals brought little other than operational problems and moral confusion," Naftali said.



Read More...

The worst bill you’ve never heard of: Act Today!

ipaction.org
The worst bill you’ve never heard of

This will be a busy week in the House -- Congress goes into summer recess Friday, but not before considering the Section 115 Reform Act of 2006 (SIRA). Never heard of SIRA? That’s the way Big Copyright and their lackey’s want it, and it's bad news for you.

Simply put, SIRA fundamentally redefines copyright and fair use in the digital world. It would require all incidental copies of music to be licensed separately from the originating copy. Even copies of songs that are cached in your computer's memory or buffered over a network would need yet another license. Once again, Big Copyright is looking for a way to double-dip into your wallet, extracting payment for the same content at multiple levels.

Today, so-called "incidental" copies don't need to be licensed; they're made in the process of doing *other* things, like listening to your MP3 library or plugging into a Net radio station. If you paid for the MP3 and the radio station is up-to-date with its bookkeeping, nobody should have to pay again, right? Not if SIRA becomes law. Out of the blue, copyright holders would have created an entire new market to charge for -- and sue over. Good for them. Bad for us.

Don't let Big Copyright legalize double dipping. Fight SIRA today.

The House is going into recess for the summer at the end of this week, so you have a unique opportunity to kill this legislation. EDIT: I got my calendars confused, the House is not going into recess until July, but it's still important to stall this legislation now. If we can stall SIRA now it would effectively kill it for the reminder of the year, giving us more time to prepare an offensive.

Please call the Members of the Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property and voice your opposition to this legislation.

Republicans:

Honorable Lamar S. Smith
2184 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
(202) 225-4236

Honorable Henry J. Hyde
2110 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
(202) 225-4561

More...

Honorable Elton Gallegly
2427 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515-0523
(202) 225-5811

Honorable Bob Goodlatte
2240 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
(202) 225-5431

Honorable William L. Jenkins
1207 Longworth Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
(202) 225-6356

Honorable Spencer Bachus
442 Cannon House Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515
202 225-4921

Hon. Robert Inglis
330 Cannon House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
(202) 225-6030

Honorable Ric Keller
419 Cannon House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
(202) 225-2176

Hon. Darrell Issa
211 Cannon House Office Bldg.
Washington, DC 20515

Honorable Chris Cannon
2436 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
(202) 225-7751

Honorable Mike Pence
426 Cannon House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
(202) 225-3021

Honorable J. Randy Forbes
307 Cannon House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
(202) 225-6365

Democrats:

Honorable Howard L. Berman
2221 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515
(202) 225-4695

Honorable John Conyers, Jr.
2426 Rayburn Building
Washington, DC 20515
(202) 225-5126

Honorable Rick Boucher
2187 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
(202) 225-3861

Honorable Zoe Lofgren
102 Cannon House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
(202) 225-3072

Honorable Maxine Waters
2344 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
(202) 225-2201

Honorable Martin T. Meehan
2229 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
(202) 225-3411

Honorable Robert Wexler
213 Cannon House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
(202) 225-3001

Honorable Anthony Weiner
1122 Longworth House Office Building
Washington DC 20515
(202) 225-6616

Honorable Adam Schiff
326 Cannon House Office Building
Washington D.C. 20515
(202) 225-4176

Honorable Linda T. Sanchez
1007 Longworth House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
(202) 225-6676


Link to this blog entry by Jake:
http://ipaction.org/blog/2006/06/worst-bill-youve-never-heard-of.html

Read More...

Tuesday, June 06, 2006

Bush's Next Job

huffingtonpost.com
Gina Nahai
Bush's Next Job

So he’s the biggest disaster ever to hit this country, Bush still needs a job after his second term as president is over. I know he’s been in semi-retirement since he took office anyway, and he does have that ranch, but can he really be content wielding an electric saw all day, every day, for the rest of his life?

OK, so maybe he could. Still, even if Bush himself wanted to accomplish his mission by razing all of Crawford to the ground with that one saw, there are other forces in this country that won’t allow the goose to stop laying eggs. Before you know it, some oil and construction company will smoke Bush out of his ranch, revive Darth Cheney, and rig some other election.

A bit far fetched?

Well, I remember a time, back in the year 2000, when many a Democrat in this country thought Bush would never make it to the White House. So hear me out:
I think we should find Bush a job before someone else does, and I have just the right position in mind. I think George W. Bush should be Iran’s next president.
Don’t laugh.

Right now, Bush is just about the most popular person in all of Iran. The mullahs love him; the people love him; the oil companies love him. For all I know, Karl Rove is already in Tehran designing campaign strategy while the rest of the world is busy talking about nuclear weapons and what not.

Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, whose authority supercedes that of all other clerics and officials, elected or not, takes his orders from a “higher power”, i.e. God. So does Bush, but that’s just the tip of the iceberg.
Iran’s other mullahs, who have robbed and looted the country for the past three decades, regard Bush as their personal, private Messiah: he has destroyed their biggest enemy—Saddam--and delivered to them Iraq, not to mention a large percentage of the world’s Muslim population.

The brave but struggling opposition in Iran loves Bush because they still believe the cow-boy talk about how he’s going to bring down the regime. Iranian exiles all over the world love him (well, most of them do, anyway) because he had promised he wouldn’t negotiate or even enter talks with the mullahs. In fact, during the last presidential elections, those of us Iranian-Americans who supported Kerry were accused of being traitors to the motherland, because Kerry had said he would hold talks with the mullahs about their nuclear program. And it doesn’t matter, either, that Bush has recently changed his tune about talking to the mullahs: Bush may be a liar, but at least he’s Republican. As far as the exiles are concerned, it was a Democrat—Carter—who lost Iran. But I’m digressing.

Like the mullahs, Bush and his people know how to pretend they’ve won an election. They know how to repeat the same lie until it sounds like the truth, and they even know how to stay the course even after the lies have been exposed. Most importantly, Bush, like the mullahs, knows how to rally the troops, energize the base, create a united front against the opposition. Khomeini used the battle against the Great Satan as his rallying cry. Ahmadinejad uses Isreal, the Jews, and the Holocaust. Bush uses Bin Laden, Saddam, or, in leaner times, gay marriage.

Trust me on this: whatever the mullahs have done in Iran, Bush can do better.

Read More...

Divide and Conquer the Voters

The New York Times
Divide and Conquer the Voters

President Bush devoted his Saturday radio speech to a cynical boost for a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage. It was depressing in the extreme to hear the chief executive trying to pretend, at this moment in American history, that this was a critical priority.

Mr. Bush's central point was that the nation is under siege from "activist judges" who are striking down anti-gay-marriage laws that conflict with their own state constitutions. That's their job, just as it is the job of state legislators to either fix the laws or change their constitutions.

If there's anything the country should have learned over the past five years, it is that Mr. Bush and his supporters have no problem with judicial decisions, no matter how cutting edge, that endorse their political positions. They trot out the "activist judge" threat only when they're worried about getting out their base on Election Day.

The aim of the president's radio address — which darkly warned that Massachusetts and San Francisco (nudge, nudge) are going to destroy marriage — is the same as the Republican leadership's plans to trot out one cultural hot button after another in the coming weeks. After gay marriage comes the push for a constitutional ban on flag burning, a solution in search of a problem if there ever was one.

All this effort to divert the nation's attention to issues that divide and distract would be bad enough if the country were not facing real, disastrous problems at home and abroad. But then, if that weren't the case, Mr. Bush probably wouldn't feel moved to stoop so low.




Read More...

FAA Making the Skies Less Safe

Reuters
FAA imposes contract terms on air controllers
By John Crawley

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Bush administration imposed new contract terms on more than 14,500 U.S. air traffic controllers on Monday after failing to reach a negotiated agreement with the controllers' union, officials said.

The Federal Aviation Administration plans to phase in pay cuts for new hires as well as new rules to boost worker productivity that were not resolved during 10 months of bargaining, which included mediation.

"The phase-in will be handled in a deliberate and orderly manner," FAA Administrator Marion Blakey said in a statement.

The FAA hopes the contract will save it nearly $2 billion over five years.

Agency officials are under pressure from transportation planners and congressional leaders to cut spending and operate more like a business.

Blakey took a firm position and said during negotiations the deal she ended up with would not be as lucrative as the previous contract, which was negotiated in 1998.

Relations between the FAA and controllers, who handle commercial flights and private planes nationwide, have sunk to their lowest level since 1981 when President Ronald Reagan fired 13,000 striking controllers who refused his back-to-work order.

The National Air Traffic Controllers Association, the union representing the workers, has not threatened any strike or other job action but has argued that the FAA's contract could jeopardize safety.

Blakey imposed the contract on the first day she was permitted to do so after a 60-day congressional review of the plan.

Congress did not make any changes, but a separate legislative proposal in the House of Representatives to push disputed areas of the contract to arbitration could be voted on as early as Tuesday.

The controllers said the FAA moved prematurely to impose terms.

"There is no reason for the administrator to subject her employees to the increasing acrimony created by this rush to implementation," the union's president, John Carr, said in a statement.



Read More...

Lawmakers took millions in free trips

Reuters
Lawmakers took millions in free trips: study
By Thomas Ferraro

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Members of the U.S. Congress and their aides took free trips worth nearly $50 million paid for by corporations, trade associations and other private groups between January 2000 and June 2005, according to a study released on Monday.

Some of the 23,000 trips featured $500-a-night hotel rooms, $25,000 corporate jet rides and visits to popular spots such as Paris, Hawaii and Colorado ski resorts, said the study, by the Center for Public Integrity, American Public Media and Northwestern University's Medill News Service.

The study found that many of those who picked up the tabs were at the same time seeking to shape legislation on Capitol Hill or win federal contracts.

"In many instances, trip sponsors appeared to be buying access to elected officials or their advisors," the study said.

While most excursions seemed to be legitimate fact-finding missions, others appeared to have been little more than "pricey vacations ... wrapped around speeches or seminars" in which the lawmaker was often joined by family members, according to the study and researchers who conducted it.

The data emerged from a nine-month-long review of congressional travel disclosure forms and coincided with ongoing federal investigations of political corruption and efforts to clean up how Congress does business.

Lobbyist Jack Abramoff pleaded guilty to fraud charges in January and admitted he showered golf trips, sports tickets and other gifts on lawmakers in return for actions that would help his clients.

In response, the Senate and House of Representatives have voted to toughen ethics guidelines and require greater disclosure. But critics have charged more needs to be done.

Lawmakers and their aides can take trips financed by outside groups to help them learn about issues or to deliver speeches, such as commencement addresses. Lobbyists may not pay for congressional trips but can help to arrange them.

'INDIFFERENCE TO THE RULES'

The study was released at a news conference where its sponsors said they found more than 1,000 violations of congressional rules, many of them involving lawmakers who inadequately filed disclosure reports.

Other infractions included members taking more than the one permitted family member on a trip, accepting gifts worth more than the $49.99 limit and lobbyists picking up the travel tab.

"There's a remarked indifference to the rules shown by members of Congress," said Wendell Rawls of the Center for Public Integrity, adding "they are rarely, if ever, reprimanded."

"When confronted with a rules violation they simply ask for and receive a waiver from the House ethics committee or else they just submit an amended form," Rawls said.

Congressional trip sponsors, the study said, included Microsoft, Time Warner and The Walt Disney Co., along with the Association of American Railroads.

Tom White, an association spokesman, was quoted in the study as saying that such getaways "provide an opportunity for us to discuss our issues with members in an atmosphere where you are not time-constrained.

"If you try to talk to a member for any great length of time ... in Washington, they are simply too busy," White said.

Former House Majority Leader Rep. Tom DeLay and his staffers accepted about a half million dollars in trips during the period under review -- more than any other congressional office, the study said.

DeLay resigned as House Republican leader last year after he was indicted on charges of violating campaign finance laws in his home state of Texas.




Read More...

Ex-NYC Mayor Rudolph Giuliani Blames 'Incompetence' for Cuts in City's Anti-Terror Funding

ABC News
Giuliani Blasts NYC Anti-Terror Fund Cuts
Ex-NYC Mayor Rudolph Giuliani Blames 'Incompetence' for Cuts in City's Anti-Terror Funding
By BETH FOUHY
The Associated Press

NEW YORK - Former Mayor Rudolph Giuliani on Monday blamed poor decision-making and "a certain level of incompetence" for the Department of Homeland Security's decision to slash the city's anti-terrorism funding.

But Giuliani, a Republican, said Monday he didn't believe political considerations had led to the 40 percent cut, announced last week, and said he was encouraged by Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff's willingness to review the agency's decision.

"I think the decision was wrong from everything I know about it," Giuliani told The Associated Press. "You have to assume we are a big target, because terrorists want to hit a big target and kill a lot of people with spectacular effect."

Giuliani's performance as mayor after the Sept. 11 attacks on the World Trade Center catapulted him to national prominence.

Giuliani said he would join Mayor Michael Bloomberg and other leaders to push for the money to be restored if they thought it helpful.

"I don't want to interfere," he said. "I just know from my days as mayor that what you don't need is to have people interfere."

The Department of Homeland Security said last week it planned to reduce New York's anti-terrorism allotment by $83 million from last year's $207 million, while boosting funding for smaller cities and rural areas.

Chertoff and Bloomberg spoke on the phone Monday, but the conversation appeared to leave little room for change on this year's round of funding, mayoral aides said.

Still, the mayor was encouraged to hear future grants to New York could increase after some of the smaller cities had their needs addressed, Bloomberg spokesman Stu Loeser said.

On Monday, Giuliani called Chertoff a "a good friend," noting that he had hired him as a federal prosecutor in the mid-1980s, when Giuliani was the U.S. attorney in Manhattan.

"If I were the mayor, I'd want a meeting with him," Giuliani said. "They've made a significant mistake, and they should restore the money."

A worksheet that helped determine funding levels said New York has no national monuments or icons to protect, an assessment that has led to bipartisan scorn.

But Chertoff has said that it's unfair to think New York icons such as the Statue of Liberty aren't high on the government's priorities. New York was in line for lower funding levels because it received such huge allotments from the government in the years immediately after Sept. 11, he said.

Giuliani on Monday called the agency's conclusion about monuments "odd" but said it was defensible to base a city's terror risk at least in part on its monuments.

"We've got the Empire State Building, the Statue of Liberty and the (New York) Stock Exchange," Giuliani argued. "They just incompetently evaluated their own criteria."

Giuliani dismissed concerns that New York had been penalized for being in a large, heavily Democratic state.

"I would have thought that, but the fact is, they cut funding from a lot of other places," Giuliani said. "Unless there's a master political strategy, they were not evaluating the ultimate result of the formulas they were using."

New Orleans, San Diego and Phoenix are among the cities slated for cuts.

Associated Press Writer Sara Kugler contributed to this report.



Read More...

Bernanke voices inflation fears

BBC NEWS
Bernanke voices inflation fears

Despite a slowdown in the economy the US Federal Reserve may have to raise rates to keep inflation under control, chairman Ben Bernanke has warned.

Great care needed to be taken over future rate decisions as the US economy was entering a "period of transition".

Mr Bernanke said that recent increases in inflation - triggered by rising fuel prices - were an unwelcome development.

Experts fear any further rate rise to rein in inflation could curtail economic growth.

Inflation had "reached a level that, if sustained, would be at or above the upper end of the range that many economists, including myself, would consider consistent with price stability and the promotion of maximum long-run growth," Mr Bernanke told a forum of global bankers.

To combat inflation, the Fed has raised rates 16 times since June 2004 to their current level of 5%.

Expansion cooling

Mr Bernanke also told the forum that the Fed's next rate decision, later this month, would rely heavily on how measures of economic activity and inflation looked.

Recent data showing weak growth and high prices has triggered fears that the US could now be suffering from "stagflation" - low growth coupled with high inflation.

Earlier on Monday, the latest sign that US expansion may be cooling came from figures that showed the growth in the service sector had slowed.

Meanwhile, over the past three months consumer price inflation has risen to 3%.

Elsewhere, wage growth has slowed, as has consumer spending, while unemployment benefit claims are increasing.

"These developments are consistent with the softening in the pace of overall economic activity that seems to be under way," Mr Bernanke said.

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/business/5050454.stm



Read More...

Monday, June 05, 2006

Katherine Harris' Senate run worries many in her party

USA TODAY
Katherine Harris' Senate run worries many in her party
By Jill Lawrence, USA TODAY

FANNING SPRINGS, Fla. — Amid the sweaty crowds at Red Belly Day, bypassing the gospel singers, the funnel cakes and the belly-flop contest in the Suwannee River, the true believers find their way to Rep. Katherine Harris.

They offer up their loyalty, their votes, their view that her fellow Republicans should be giving her more support. "Aren't people sweet?" the Sarasota congresswoman asks as she dispenses hugs.

The woman who oversaw the 2000 presidential vote recount in Florida is running for the GOP Senate nomination — inspiring dread among many in her party. Whether they measure by fundraising, polls, disarray, ethics, strange behavior or potential to polarize, they see trouble.

Democratic Sen. Bill Nelson, seeking a second term, is polling twice as high as Harris. Gov. Jeb Bush, saying Harris could not win, staged a search for an alternative.

To no avail. The Sept. 5 primary will pit three little-known latecomers against the high-profile Harris.

The gravest threat to her candidacy, and to the Republican ticket if she tops it, is her link to corrupt defense contractor Mitchell Wade. Wade, former CEO of MZM Inc., has pleaded guilty to four criminal charges and said he tried to influence Harris.

Harris, 49, denies wrongdoing, but recent revelations that Wade gave her illegal contributions and expensive dinners led to the latest in a series of staff desertions. "Every time I turned over a rock, I found out something I didn't want to know," says Ed Rollins, a former Reagan aide who was Harris's chief adviser until he quit in March.

Pollster Ed Goeas says he left because "I kept giving her advice that she chose not to take." That includes his final words of wisdom, which were: "Get out."

As Florida secretary of State during the recount, Harris ran the process that gave George W. Bush his Florida win. Florida's electoral votes put Bush in the White House. She's a hero to many Republicans. "She took a lot of personal hits for doing the right thing," says John Friskey, chairman of the Dixie County Republican Party.

Harris says she did what she had to: "The only compliment I'll accept is, 'Thank you for following the law.' "

Democrats did not perceive Harris, who was also a Bush campaign official, as impartial. The memory is still raw. Justin Burgess of Gainesville, working the Red Belly crowd for a Democratic legislator, talked warmly with Harris about a mutual friend. Later he said he could never vote for her: "She's a great lady, but — the 2000 election. That's all I can say."

Among her other problems:

•Her late father's legacy. Harris, a citrus heiress, pledged on Fox News Channel in March that she'd put her father's legacy to her — a $10 million inheritance — "on the line" to win her race. In an interview last week, Harris said her father's legacy was "extraordinary work and integrity." As for money, "There's nothing that I have specifically from my father." Harris has given $3 million to her campaign and says she'll liquidate personal assets if necessary.

•Her appearance. Harris likes tight clothing. Jim Dornan, her former campaign manager, compares it to debutante attire. "It's not the type of dress a U.S. senator should or would wear," he says. She wore a tight peach sweater to Red Belly Day, a festival named for a local fish, and sucked on a lollipop. "Oh, no," aide Brian Brooks said as a photographer snapped pictures.

•A sketchy record. Harris gets credit for a program that helps low-income people make down payments on homes. But she is better known for odd controversies, such as saying authorities had foiled a plot to blow up the Carmel, Ind., power grid. The Sarasota Herald-Tribune reported that Indiana and Washington, D.C., officials were "dumbfounded" by her statement.

•MZM. Wade was the central figure in the bribery scandal that put former California Republican congressman Randy "Duke" Cunningham in jail. Common Cause has asked the Justice Department to look into whether Harris accepted bribes.

He gave Harris $32,000 in laundered contributions, offered to raise more and sought her help securing a project in her state, according to his guilty plea. Harris did pursue the project, but it was not funded.

Wade's plea document said Harris and her staff were not told Wade broke campaign law by reimbursing the MZM employees who contributed to her campaign. "We've done nothing wrong," Harris says.

Wade also treated Harris to at least two expensive dinners; one last year cost $2,800. Harris spokesman Chris Ingram says the bill was high because Wade took home expensive wine. He says Harris consumed little and gave $100 to a Jacksonville ministry to offset her share. It's unclear whether the donation puts Harris in compliance with the House's $50 gift cap.

Harris "has yet to explain her involvement in the largest congressional bribery scandal in history," says Chad Clanton, Nelson's campaign manager.

Harris scolds Nelson for opposing tax cuts and a federal ban on same-sex marriage. He doesn't "line up with Florida values," she tells WRGO radio in Crystal River.

Harris' GOP primary rivals are retired executive LeRoy Collins Jr., developer Peter Monroe and attorney William McBride. "We know we're going to win," Harris says. "We energize the base."

At Red Belly Day, not a lot of people seek her out. Those who do are devotees. "We believe in you," retired Coast Guard engineer Joel Dyer of Tampa tells her.

Harris answers questions about health care and immigration. She offers personal advice. "Be as beautiful inside as you are outside," she tells Jessica Storey, 9, winner of the Junior Miss Dixie contest. She calls herself "a thorn between the roses" as she poses with two teen beauty queens and ends up quoting John Adams: "A politician fears man. A statesman fears God."



Find this article at:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-06-04-harris-senate_x.htm?csp=34




Read More...

Asbestos bill widens to 9/11, hurricane claims

Reuters
Asbestos bill widens to 9/11, hurricane claims
By Susan Cornwell

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Until now it has been the elephant in the room during Senate debates about asbestos poisoning: What about the vast cloud of dust that blanketed New York City when the World Trade Center collapsed?

Several senators have spent years working to craft a $140 billion fund that could process thousands of injury claims from people sickened by asbestos.

There has been little discussion of whether a new wave of claims may arise from the September 11, 2001 attacks, when a mix of pollutants was spewed over Manhattan as the Twin Towers fell. A new Senate proposal, however, has raised the subject.

Language allowing New Yorkers, along with victims of last year's Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, to file claims may attract more support for legislation to create the fund but raises new questions about whether the fund will quickly go broke.

"You have an awful lot of people whose lungs are exposed to this material," said Dr. Stephen Levin of Mount Sinai Medical Center in New York City. It has been monitoring the health of thousands of rescue workers from the September 11 disaster.

"Asbestos has been found in bulk samples, both on the pile at Ground Zero, as well as in settled dust in buildings and offices. It's surely around," Levin said in an interview.

Asbestos, a fire-retardant mineral, was widely used in building insulation and other products until the mid-1970s, and asbestos victims' groups say the World Trade Center had tons of it. Inhalation of its fibers has been linked to cancer and other diseases, which usually take years to develop.

A Senate bill by Pennsylvania Republican Arlen Specter and Vermont Democrat Patrick Leahy would create a $140 billion fund to pay up to $1.1 million to individual asbestos victims. It would be financed by companies that made or sold asbestos products -- such as W.R. Grace -- and their insurers, who in turn would be shielded from legal liability.

The senators' stated aim is to unclog courts, stop "abusive" lawsuits and pay claims of the truly ill.

But the fund would mainly pay claims of people exposed to asbestos on the job, such as construction workers. Others who believed their illness was caused by asbestos could seek compensation, but under the bill, a panel of physicians would decide whether they qualified.

9/11 AND HURRICANE DEBRIS

In recent days, language was added to the Senate bill that would let New Yorkers exposed to asbestos in the 9/11 attacks file claims for compensation along with people exposed to building debris in the Gulf Coast hurricanes.

Some experts see the provision as an attempt to win more support for the bill, which failed by one vote in February to scale a procedural hurdle in the Senate.

"More than anything, it's a political tactic, to increase Democratic support for the fund," said Andrew Parmentier, analyst at Friedman Billings Ramsey in Arlington, Virginia.

Earlier this year, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, a New York Democrat, had sought to add a similar World Trade Center amendment to the asbestos bill. Louisiana Democratic Sen. Mary Landrieu proposed the hurricane language, aides said.

But Crystal Skinner of Susquehanna Financial Group said the possibility of more claims could frighten away fiscal conservatives already worried about the fund's solvency. They fear the $140 billion fund could run out of money, "leaving the government on the hook for the unpaid claims," Skinner said.

Texas Republican Sen. John Cornyn, already a critic of the Specter-Leahy bill, is wary of adding to the fund's burden.

"Any provision specifically identifying large numbers of claimants to file without demonstrating occupational exposure will, almost certainly, only increase the cost of the trust fund," he told Reuters.

Senate Judiciary Committee staff said the provision was added to make it clear that 9/11 and hurricane victims could apply for compensation.

But Parmentier said there was a lot of "gray" in the provision. "It will be difficult for anyone to project how many claimants it would add to the fund," he said. "You could be talking about hundreds of thousands, if not in excess of a million people seeking recourse because of this provision."

Environmentalists, on the other hand, are skeptical, because the provision says nothing about claims being paid.

"It's window dressing to get people on board to support the bill, but it won't do anything to help the victims of the World Trade Center and Katrina," said Richard Wiles, senior vice president of the Environmental Working Group.

Wiles noted that some of the first responders were already in court with claims that they became ill working in the toxic ruins of the World Trade Center, but the bill would take away their option of suing for asbestos exposure.




Read More...

Lobbying Overhaul Moves Slowly Despite Scandals, With Congressional Bills Awaiting Negotiation

ABC News
Lobbying Reform Slow Despite Scandals
Lobbying Overhaul Moves Slowly Despite Scandals, With Congressional Bills Awaiting Negotiation
By JIM ABRAMS
The Associated Press

WASHINGTON - The stench of scandal on Capitol Hill is getting stronger five months after lobbyist Jack Abramoff pleaded guilty to influence-peddling charges, but a lobbying overhaul has yet to see the light of day.

The Senate passed its version at the end of March and the House bill was approved in early May. In the month since, the House has not taken the next step, naming negotiators for talks with the Senate on a compromise bill.

In the meantime:

Rep. William Jefferson, D-La., has yet to explain how $90,000 in alleged bribery money ended up in his freezer.

Rep. Bob Ney, R-Ohio, is under criminal investigation for his ties with Abramoff.

former Majority Leader Tom DeLay, R-Texas is resigning from Congress this week, battered by the guilty pleas of two former aides in the Abramoff probe and facing a trial himself in Texas on election-related money laundering charges.

It was only in January that Republicans and Democrats battled for the ethical high ground. They proposed to outlaw privately funded travel, ban meals and gifts from lobbyists, and slow the move of former lawmakers to lobbying jobs.

Rep. David Dreier, R-Calif., who has led GOP lobbying efforts in the House, said at the time he hoped to pass a bill by the end of February.

That did not happen for two reasons, according to an analyst.

Congress stumbled over how to rein in lobbyists without violating their constitutional right to petition the government, and lawmakers were sidetracked by immigration legislation, extending tax breaks and other priorities, said Rutgers University political scientist Ross Baker.

The public has not pressed the lobbying issue because "most ordinary Americans really don't think much can be done," Baker said. "There's a built-in cynicism" about corruption in Washington.

Fred Wertheimer, president of the watchdog group Democracy 21, says lawmakers may be misreading public attitude. "The public understands corruption, understands it's wrong and wants it eliminated," he said.

Dreier's spokeswoman, Jo Maney, said GOP leaders could appoint negotiators to the House-Senate conference soon after Congress returns from the Memorial Day recess. She said the effort to reach consensus on the bill has been a challenge because some lawmakers are opposed to any changes while others favor revamping the entire system.

The House bill emphasizes greater disclosure of lobbyist activities and requires approval beforehand for privately funded trips. The measure does not change current limits on meals and gifts that representatives can receive from lobbyists.

The Senate bill bans senators and staff from accepting meals from lobbyists and extends from one to two years the waiting period before a retired senator can lobby former colleagues. The bill requires lobbyists to disclose their activities in grassroots lobbying, where the public is encouraged to contact lawmakers through phone calls or television ads.

Both bills take steps to further identify the source and purpose of earmarks, the pet projects inserted in larger bills.

The House limits contributions to independent political groups known as 527s, for the section of the tax code that covers them. Senate Democrats strongly oppose this idea. While both parties took advantage of help from these groups in 2004, Democrats had greater success in raising money through them.

Neither bill would change the current practice whereby members pay only the price of a first-class ticket when they catch rides on corporate jets.

Paul Miller, president of the American League of Lobbyists, said neither bill sufficiently addresses how to better enforce current rules to deal with a lawbreaker such as Abramoff.

Since January, Miller said, there has been a subtle shift in how lobbyists do business. Now, both lawmakers and lobbyists are "going above and beyond" to avoid any semblance of impropriety, he said.

Lawmakers "being scared to talk to us is fading, which is a good thing," he said, but meetings are more likely to take place in offices rather than at a game or over dinner.

Wertheimer said there was a good chance Congress will pass a bill before the November election. But he said it is clear that such legislation would not have any effect on how influence seekers function in Washington.

"The bill we expect to come out of Congress," he said, "is going to be treated as a nonentity."




Read More...

Sunday, June 04, 2006

Sensenbrenner Wakes from a Long, Long, Nap

Read More...

I, The President

Read More...

Return the Cow Costumes

Read More...

But Where's The Trigger?

Read More...

Problem with these results

Read More...

Looks More Like Viet Nam Every Day

Read More...